OP17 · The World's Strongest Warriors · aggiornata 1 set 2026

Green Mihawk — tutto quello che c'è da sapere

Filosofia, gameplan primo/secondo, fondamentali e matchup del Mihawk verde in OP17. Integra due guide: il PowerPoint «Why is 10c Shanks So Broken? Srsly» di Josh "Impact" Graham con la sua video-lezione «Hawk Guide Law/Yasopp Version» (versione Law + Yasopp) e il deep dive video «op17 mihawk deep dive» di samsansOP con le sue note ordinate (versione Mihawk 6c + Perona) — più il documento comparativo «LawSopp vs HawkRona», integrato per argomenti in tutta la guida e distillato nel quiz «Che mazzo sei?».
Midrange aggressivo Finisher: 10 Shanks + Luna Impact · Law + Yasopp Sam · Mihawk + Perona
Dracule Mihawk leader + Shanks 10 costi
Come leggere la guida. Ogni blocco ha un'etichetta di fonte: Impact = testo verbatim delle slide del pptx (Law + Yasopp); Sam = testo verbatim delle note ordinate del video di samsansOP (Mihawk + Perona); i blocchi tratteggiati «Sam · dal video» (viola) e «Impact · dal video» (blu) sono aggiunte prese direttamente dai rispettivi video, con timestamp cliccabile; LawSopp vs HawkRona = punti dal documento comparativo che mette le due versioni fianco a fianco (bordo verde); Sintesi = confronto/integrazione scritto per questa guida. Il contenuto strategico è lasciato in inglese per non alterarlo; titoli e sintesi sono in italiano. Le ⚠️ segnalano i punti in cui le note non coincidono con quello che Sam dice nel video.

In 30 secondi

Mihawk verde è un midrange aggressivo con finisher rush: usa i 3 DON!! gratis del leader (più 1 dello stage) per sviluppare corpi da 6000 e spingere danno ogni turno, pesca tantissimo con searcher / Samurai / Kin'emon, e chiude con 10 Shanks (12000 rush che riposa tutto il board avversario) + Luna che congela quel board + Vander Decken che rimuove il corpo che conta. Law & Bepo resta a 1 copia come seconda bomba. Il mirror è il matchup più importante e si vince a chi arriva prima a Shanks + Luna: per questo vai secondo nel mirror e non scendere a 0 vite con leggerezza.
Entrambe le fonti concordano
  • Il deck vuole chiudere in fretta: non è più il Mihawk OP14 che allungava con Law/Bepo.
  • Shanks + Luna (+ Decken) è la fine partita che definisce OP17.
  • 1 sola Law & Bepo: seconda bomba, non piano principale.
  • Rad Beam / Billions vale più degli altri 3k perché difende i corpi a metà partita.
  • Mirror: vai secondo; contra i colpi piccoli perché Shanks colpisce troppo forte.
  • Non tenere in mano gli eventi: i DON!! finiscono tutti nel turno Shanks + Luna.
Dove le due versioni divergono
  • Shell 5-6 costi: Impact gioca 4 Law 6c + 4 Yasopp; Sam preferisce 6c Mihawk + 5c Perona (più forte nel mirror e vs bombe grosse).
  • For Fun: 2 copie per Impact (vs Saul); Sam non la considera prioritaria.
  • Stun Bonney (OP07): Sam la testa come tech da mirror andando primo; nel pptx per Impact era solo un tech possibile, ma nella video-lezione (1 set) anche lui ne gioca 2 («this Bonney card is broken») — questa divergenza si è chiusa.
  • Coffin Boat: 2 per entrambi, ma Sam ne giocava 1 e considera un terzo solo "convincibile".
  • Vs Sabo: Impact fa board control con Yasopp sui 2 costi; Sam (senza Yasopp) attacca e sconsiglia lo "starve" completo.
  • Vs Kaido: entrambi vanno primi, ma Sam dice che è l'unico matchup in cui lo fa.
  • In una riga: Sam alza il floor (meno mani fallite), Impact alza il ceiling di tempo (più pressione). Indeciso? C'è il quiz «Che mazzo sei?».

Le due fonti

Fonte 1 · Impact

«Why is 10c Shanks So Broken? Srsly — A Mihawk Guide in OP17» (pptx + video-lezione 2h08)

PowerPoint di 34 slide di Josh "Impact" Graham. Quattro parti: intro al deck, il deck (decklist + tech + mulligan + curve primo/secondo), fondamentali e gameplay, matchup (Mihawk, Rocks, Sabo, Kaido, Robin, Enel). Versione Law + Yasopp. Dal 1 set 2026 c'è anche la sua video-lezione della guida («Hawk Guide Law/Yasopp Version», 2h07m) con appunti: le slide commentate a voce più esempi, numeri d'attacco e Q&A — i dettagli nuovi sono integrati in tutta la guida nei blocchi tratteggiati blu, il video è nel tab 🎬.

Trafalgar Law+Yasopp
Fonte 2 · samsansOP

«op17 mihawk deep dive» (video 2h00 + note ordinate)

Sessione video di Sam (samsansOP) del 29 ago 2026, registrata a Orlando prima del regionale, più le note strutturate del video. Copre: cosa è cambiato da OP16.5, scelte di lista (Decken, Shanks, Luna, Stun Bonney, shell Mihawk vs Law, Law/Bepo, Boats, Rad Beam, perché no Stronger/For Fun/DMG), mirror, Sabo, Rocks, Kaido, Big Mom gialli/Robin, Ace Luffy, principi generali, più 33 domande del Q&A. Versione Mihawk 6c + Perona 5c. Nel video Sam dice che Josh (Impact) è «really high on» la lista Law/Yasopp: le due fonti sono quindi le due scuole di pensiero dello stesso gruppo di test.

Dracule Mihawk 6c+Perona 5c
Risorsa 3 · il confronto «LawSopp vs HawkRona»

«Mihawk+Perona vs Law+Yasopp»

Documento comparativo che mette le due scuole fianco a fianco su una quarantina di argomenti (identità, shell 5-6 costi, bombe, mirror, Sabo, gestione delle risorse) e chiude con una «Fast Decision Table» per scegliere la lista. Battezza le due versioni HawkRona (Sam · 6c Mihawk + Perona) e LawSopp (Impact · Law + Yasopp). I suoi punti sono integrati in tutta la guida nei blocchi col bordo verde, sezione per sezione; la tavola decisionale è diventata il quiz «Che mazzo sei?».

Cos'è il deck (e cosa non è)

Impact · Slide 3 — What The Deck Is
  • Midrange Deck
  • Rush Finisher
  • Builds Board by developing sticky characters quickly.
  • Finds follow-up plays consistently due to the immense amount of card draw.
  • Aggressive leaning.
  • Really fundamentals heavy deck. Requires good understanding of how to play midrange decks well. Requires good understanding of how to play One Piece well.
Impact · Slide 4 — What The Deck Isn't
  • Not a control deck.
  • Though it is able to control the board and win resource battles if it has to, your primary win condition is dealing damage, not grinding people out of the game.
  • The deck uses freezes to push tempo, not extend the game.
  • This isn't OP14 style Mihawk where Law and Bepo was used to extend games multiple turns and use boss monsters like Mihawk and Shanks to control the opponent. It is meant to end games quickly.
Impact · Slide 5 — Deck's Strengths
  • Very consistent. Key pieces are searchable with Otama and Perona.
  • Lots of card draw means you will be able to filter towards unsearchable pieces (Vander Decken, Yasopp, Coffin Boat)
  • Deck cheats an unbelievable amount of DON every turn. 4 extra DON between leader and stage.
  • Deck is strong at racing because of Shanks and Luna.
  • Deck is strong at ending games quickly because the excess DON from leader skill lets you develop attackers while attacking for more damage.
Impact · Slide 6 — Decks Weaknesses
  • Deck can be weak to early aggression or explosive starts.
  • The deck has a higher than normal brick count (It is a GREEN deck so it is to be expected) so it requires a little bit more micro managing than most decks.
  • Deck can be weak to large characters that are outside of Luna range if you don't have Vander Decken early.
  • Other than that - no real weaknesses. This is an incredibly overtuned deck.
Il motore in una riga (Sintesi)
Mihawk leader+Coffin Boat→You Can Be My Samurai+Kin'emon→Shanks+Electrical Luna

Il leader (5000, +1000 se il leader avversario è <Slash>) riposa 1 carta e attiva 3 DON!! se hai un personaggio da 5+ in campo (poi non puoi più giocare personaggi nel turno); lo stage ne riattiva 1 a fine turno. Quei DON!! "gratis" pagano Samurai, Kin'emon, searcher ed eventi mentre attacchi per 7000 con i corpi da 6000. Le carte in più ti portano a Shanks (12000 rush: attiva 2 DON!! e riposa tutti i personaggi avversari) e a Luna (i personaggi riposati da 7 costi o meno non si rialzano).

Identità OP17: cosa è cambiato da OP16.5

Sam · Session Overview

Sam OP17 Mihawk session focuses on how the deck has changed from OP16.5 and why the new Shanks, Vander Decken, Luna, and stun package has reshaped both deckbuilding and matchup strategy. Her broad conclusion is:

  • Mihawk is likely the strongest overall deck in the current OP17 environment.
  • It is not necessarily Tier 0, and Kaido, Sabo, Robin, and other decks remain valid tournament choices.
  • Mihawk's mirror is the matchup that matters most for serious tournament preparation.
  • The deck's main advantage is no longer only Law/Bepo endgames. It now has a Shanks plus Vander Decken plus Luna endgame that can invalidate entire boards.
  • Deck construction should prioritize strong mirror performance while retaining enough tools to beat Sabo, Rocks, Kaido, yellow Big Mom decks, and other important field decks.
Sam · dal video
  • 00:00:49 Mihawk is "the most likely thing that any of us play in a tournament"; "my opinion is not that it's tier zero"; Kaido is "a very reasonable deck to play for a tournament", especially for nationals.
  • 00:01:38 "There is a lot of internal disagreement right now about how the deck list should look."
  • 00:08:00 "Stats say" Mihawk is best "by a considerable margin"; her group found some ways to win the mirror going first without tech, but not reliable ones.
  • 00:35:37 "47 of these cards are the same" across everyone's lists: the Stun Bonney and Bepo slots are where people differ.
Sam · The OP17 Mihawk Game Plan

OP17 Mihawk is still fundamentally built around the same strong Wano core: Searchers · Samurai effects · Perona · Oden · Mihawk · Law/Bepo · Rad Beam · Efficient board development · Strong event-based defense.

The deck still wants to:

  1. Develop a 5-cost body on its first relevant curve turn.
  2. Build efficient 6-cost and 5-cost combinations.
  3. Use Perona and Oden to prevent the opponent's board from converting.
  4. Generate card advantage through Samurai, searchers, Mihawk filtering, and Oden.
  5. Transition into a late-game bomb turn.
  6. Use high leader power, Luna, Shanks, Vander Decken, or Law/Bepo to finish.

What has changed is the endgame. In OP16.5, Mihawk mirrors often became Law/Bepo wars. Stun cards were less important because the opponent's board frequently could not convert anyway. In OP17, Shanks changes that. When Mihawk plays Shanks:

  • Opponent's board can be rested.
  • Luna can freeze the board.
  • Vander Decken can remove a key large body.
  • Mihawk can attack with a 12k threat on the same turn.
  • The opponent is often pushed to zero life while their board is disabled.

This means stuns now have much more value because Shanks creates the board state that makes Luna devastating.

Il turno Shanks (Sam)
Shanks+Vander Decken IX+Electrical Luna
  1. Establish enough board earlier in the game.
  2. Play Shanks.
  3. Rest or force opposing bodies sideways.
  4. Use Vander Decken to remove the most important target.
  5. Use Luna to freeze the remaining board.
  6. Attack with a 12k body and other existing attackers.
  7. Put the opponent at zero or nearly zero.
  8. Force the opponent to respond immediately without a functional board.

Shanks is especially strong in the mirror because it removes the old assumption that medium bodies automatically retain value into Law/Bepo turns.

⚠️ Nel video i singoli pezzi ci sono tutti, ma la forma "a checklist numerata" è una sintesi di chi ha scritto le note.
Impact · dal video (1 set 2026)
  • 00:20:10 La matematica che rende Shanks rotto: «It is more efficient to attack for 5-17 with Shanks than it is to just attack 15 when your opponent has no life. I think this is the first time that it is more efficient to play a rush character and just attack with it than it is to just full jam the leader. […] Instead of asking your opponent for 11k counter, you're asking your opponent for 14k counter on the last turn of the game.»
  • 00:06:56 I DON!! gratis quantificati: «Every turn is four extra DON!! between leader and stage. When you combine Shanks, it's six extra DON!!» — e sul turno a 10: «It's actually 16 if you have the stage. It's actually 17 if you have Smoker. It's like stupid.» (00:26:24)
  • 00:08:29 Brick count quantificato: «Most decks play like 10 to 11 bricks. Mihawk plays like 18 just because it is a green deck» — ma il draw del colore compensa, «similar to Rocks».
  • 00:10:49 Previsione ban: «Deck is pretty overtuned… kind of broken. I think we will likely play this month without any bans, but I could see October or November — probably by EB05 release they'll probably limit Shanks, not Mihawk», perché leader skill + DON!! gratis di Shanks nello stesso turno sono troppi.

Dove concordano e dove divergono

Sintesi
TemaImpact (Law + Yasopp)Sam (Mihawk + Perona)
Natura del deckMidrange aggressivo con rush finisher; «meant to end games quickly».Stesso core Wano; «transition into a late-game bomb turn»; il mirror è la priorità di costruzione.
Shell 5-6 costi4 Law 6c + 4 Yasopp: double develop, Yasopp riposa e si rialza, board control presto.6c Mihawk + 5c Perona: corpo più grosso che resta in piedi, filtra i brick, Perona blocca 2 attacchi da 6k. «Every card in this deck is worse with Law than with Mihawk except the Stun Bonney».
Law & Bepo1 copia: allunga di un turno, punisce chi gioca attorno a Shanks.Poche copie (non «five» bombe): seconda bomba che comprime Shanks+Decken+Luna in una carta.
Vander Decken4 copie: removal e set-up di Luna; chiave vs 7-8 costi (Kata/Teach) e vs Shiki.«Close to standard»: nasce per Sabo, buono «by accident» nel mirror; esiste anche una build senza Decken (Bonney + Bepo).
Luna2 copie; «games are won or lost by how many turns you can stall with Luna».Molto più importante che in OP16.5: converte Shanks in un pacchetto tempo che chiude. Unica eccezione: vs Kaido è «uniquely bad».
Eventi 3k3 Billions + 2 For Fun (vs Saul).Più Rad Beam (difende i corpi); no Stronger, For Fun poco affidabile, DMG meno necessaria.
Coffin Boat2 copie.2 copie (prima 1); giocala sempre a meno che i DON!! servano per Luna.
Stun BonneyTech possibile (OP07 Jewelry Bonney).Tech attivo nel mirror andando primo: toglie all'avversario il turno Shanks. Buona anche vs Big Mom gialli e per togliere King a Kaido.
MirrorVai secondo; si gioca sul danno; contra i colpi piccoli; trova le Luna.Vai secondo «for sure»; chi arriva prima a Shanks+Luna vince; stai ad almeno 2 vite prima del loro turno a 10 DON!!.
SaboVai secondo; Yasopp sui 2 costi, Oden sui Loki, For Fun sui Saul; 45-55 (50-50 con i tech).Matchup peggiore ma «I don't feel that bad about it»; ~60% andando secondo; attacca, non fare starve completo; Law/Bepo chiude.
RocksVai secondo; Luna spacca tutto ma occhio a Captain John + "Usopp event"; Decken sui Shiki.Molto favorevole soprattutto secondo; board 6+5 in piedi, Rad Beam vs Shiki, Shanks+Luna; Kyo non cambia molto; attacca a 8 non a 7.
KaidoVai primo; attacca per 7000 con i personaggi; Yasopp rialza Shanks vs 10 Mom.«The only matchup where you want to pick first»; Oden su 7 e 9 per fermare King; se mancano King vinci sempre; Luna da scartare.
Robin / Big Mom gialliVai primo; Yasopp toglie i 4k; Shanks+Decken+Luna sui 4k è la win con.Favorevole; congela i piccoli attaccanti, spingili bassi prima delle cure; Stun Bonney sul primo turno Big Mom (vs Robin può voler dire sul tuo 6).
EnelVai primo; pressa una vita a turno, Oden sugli Enel grossi, Shanks sui Reiju.— (non trattato)
Ace Luffy (RG)— (non trattato)«I don't have a great answer»: Oden sul loro corpo, attacca, contra la seconda vita; favorito secondo.
Black (Elbaph) Luffy— (non trattato)Stesso piano di Sabo ma attacchi più piccoli: sempre in faccia.
LawSopp vs HawkRona · il confronto in cinque punti
  • Stessa natura, due leve. Entrambe sono midrange aggressivi proattivi: nessuna delle due scuole pensa che il Mihawk OP17 debba giocare da control lento. Ma Sam costruisce per un floor più alto — ridurre le mani fallite e arrivare al pivot Shanks con le carte, il board, le vite e i counter giusti — mentre Impact costruisce per un ceiling di tempo più alto: board veloce, DON!! extra convertiti in attacchi, avversario forzato dentro il kill range di Shanks.
  • Fonte del vantaggio. HawkRona migliora la qualità delle risorse: card quality, sequencing pulito, filtraggio, timing dei freeze, disruption nel mirror. LawSopp aumenta la quantità e la velocità di conversione: volume di pescate, search ripetute, double development, pressione resiliente di Yasopp, attacchi coi DON!! gratis.
  • Punto debole. HawkRona rinuncia a un po' di board control diretto (soprattutto vs Sabo) non sfruttando Yasopp a pieno; LawSopp può pescare il mix sbagliato di setup e brick, restare senza bersagli per Law o incastrarsi nel sequencing Samurai/Law. In breve: scegli Sam se odi l'inconsistenza, scegli Impact se odi perdere il board presto.
  • Skill test. Sono entrambi mazzi difficili, ma nei punti opposti della partita: HawkRona testa life mapping, soglie di counter, quando saltare uno sviluppo di poco valore e la navigazione della corsa alle bombe; LawSopp testa il sequencing — search prima di Law, gestione dei bersagli, protezione del board, breakpoint di danno, letali multi-step.
  • Le due lezioni da portarsi a casa (qualunque lista tu giochi): da Sam, «pescare di più non è migliorare la mano» — è la matematica di vite e counter a decidere se Shanks vince davvero. Da Impact, «non giocare Mihawk passivo» — costruisci board, converti i DON!! gratis in 7k e mappa l'avversario dentro il range di Shanks. Insieme sono i fondamentali più solidi del deck.
Impact · dal video — la replica sul mirror (1 set 2026)

Alla domanda diretta se la build Mihawk/Perona sia migliore nel mirror: 00:54:32 «I think it's like marginal. If it's better, it's only slightly better. I also really like Law because I really like Bonney-Law. […] I played against several of the Mihawk-Perona builds and I beat them all — Law was very critical in resetting my Bonney so I can stun them off multiple 10-Shanks.» E l'argomento-torneo: «The Yasopp stuff actually helps you beat the decks that are actually trying to beat you. So you're more likely to go far in a tournament, instead of trying to beat up on the mirrors — I think mirrors are fundamentals games anyway.» (00:55:20) Fino alla previsione: «I think the Hawk-Perona build is going to get gapped by the Stun Bonney-Law stuff.» (01:56:57)

Le due versioni del deck

Versione A Law + Yasopp · Versione B Mihawk + Perona

Sam nel video: «47 of these cards are the same». Il core Wano (searcher, Kin'emon, Samurai, Oden, Kawamatsu, Decken, Shanks, Luna, Rad Beam, Boat, 1 Law/Bepo) è identico; cambiano lo slot da 5-6 costi (Law 6c + Yasopp oppure 6c Mihawk + 5c Perona) e i tech (For Fun / Stun Bonney).

Versione A — Law + Yasopp (Impact)

Impact · Slide 8 — The Decklist - Standard Decklist
Decklist standard di Impact
La decklist standard dal pptx (50 carte). Conteggio ricavato dalle pile nell'immagine.
Dracule MihawkL
Dracule Mihawk
OP14-020
Otama4
Otama
OP07-022
Perona4
Perona (1c)
OP12-034
Kin'emon4
Kin'emon
ST32-001
Vander Decken IX4
Vander Decken IX
OP06-033
Kawamatsu4
Kawamatsu
OP12-023
Yasopp4
Yasopp
OP17-031
Kouzuki Oden4
Kouzuki Oden
ST32-002
Trafalgar Law4
Trafalgar Law (6c)
OP13-031
Shanks4
Shanks (10c)
OP17-022
Law & Bepo1
Law & Bepo
ST24-004
You Can Be My Samurai!!4
You Can Be My Samurai!!
OP01-055
Billion-fold World Trichiliocosm3
Billion-fold World Trichiliocosm
OP06-038
For Fun2
For Fun
OP14-037
Electrical Luna2
Electrical Luna
OP08-036
Coffin Boat2
Coffin Boat
OP14-039
Nota su Kawamatsu. Il 5c 6000 vanilla con counter 2000 è nel deck perché è {Fish-Man}: è la carta da scartare per attivare Vander Decken IX (che KO un personaggio riposato). Sam nel video: «you will very consistently have a thing to pitch for the Decken».

Le carte chiave secondo Impact

Impact · Slide 11 — Key Cards
  • Perona, she finds everything
  • Kinemon - helps filter bricks, Law / Samurai target, helps draw towards unsearchable pieces.
  • Shanks. This card DOES EVERYTHING. It's a finisher, it's removal, it sets up removal, it sets up Luna. Broken card. Will eventually be pair banned with this leader. Super broken to have a 5 cost 12000 rusher.
  • Law, allows you to double develop. Putting in Yasopp rested doesn't matter as Yasopp will restand itself.
  • Yasopp is broken. Board control tool in the early game. Very difficult to deal with without hard removal. Also restands your Shanks (important vs Purple or Rocks)
Perché "5 cost 12000 rusher" (Sintesi)

Shanks costa 10, ma il leader ti ha appena riattivato 3 DON!! e Shanks stesso ne riattiva 2 quando entra: i DON!! effettivamente "persi" sono 5. Per lo stesso motivo Impact scrive «Ends the game with a Shanks + 5 extra DON to swing out».

Impact · Slide 9 — Possible Techs
Hody JonesHody Jones Mihawk 6cMihawk 6c + Perona 5cPerona SmokerSmoker Dead Man's GameDead Mans Game Jewelry BonneyOP07 Jewelry Bonney Law & BepoLaw and Bepo
Gli ID delle tech non sono nel pptx: Hody = OP06-035 (7c rush, riposa 2 carte/DON!!), Smoker = presumibilmente OP10-030 (5c 7000 Banish, attiva 1 DON!!), OP07 Bonney = OP07-026 (la "Stun Bonney" di Sam).
Impact · dal video — flex slot e lista già aggiornata (1 set 2026)
  • 00:13:54 I flex slot dichiarati: «The cards that I consider flex are the Law and Bepo, the For Funs, the fourth Shanks probably.»
  • 00:13:54 Perché 4 Shanks: «I personally like four Shanks because I think it's really important to hit back-to-back Shanks in almost every matchup. And if you play four of it, it's easy to pitch the first one off Kin'emon. […] When I played three, I had to take it off searches more than I like to.»
  • 00:14:39 La wishlist: «I would love to play more stages, but I can't. I would like to play a third Luna, but I don't know if there's space. I would like to play a fourth Billion.»
  • 01:50:21 La lista che gioca nei VOD non è più quella della slide 8: «From the deck list in the guide it's: cut the For Funs, add another Billion, cut the Law/Bepo, two Bonney» — copiata da una top-4 cinese (01:31:23 «very important to try other people's decks»). Risultato: 4 Shanks · 4 Rad Beam · 2 Luna · 2 Boat · 2 Stun Bonney · 0 For Fun · 0 Law&Bepo. È diversa anche dal frame «17hawklaw» di Sam qui sotto (3 Shanks / 3 Luna / 3 Rad Beam / 1 Bepo).
  • ⚠️ Ambivalenza dichiarata: a voce continua a raccomandare il singolo Law/Bepo («I usually recommend to play the single Law/Bepo», 00:37:13) ma la lista che ha giocato lo taglia per le 2 Bonney.

Versione B — Mihawk 6c + Perona 5c (Sam)

Sam · lista ricostruita dal video
Attenzione: Sam condivide lo schermo ma non legge la lista carta per carta. I conteggi certi detti a voce sono solo 4 Samurai e 2 Coffin Boat; per il resto la griglia sotto usa la struttura "47 carte uguali" + le carte che lei dichiara di giocare. I numeri in viola con «?» sono non dichiarati. La lista completa sarebbe stata pubblicata su Codex dopo la sessione. Per i conteggi più probabili del core vedi la lista «17hawklaw» visibile nel video (3 Shanks, 3 Rad Beam, 3 Luna, 4 Oden, 4 Decken, 2 Boat, 1 Law/Bepo).
Dracule MihawkL
Dracule Mihawk
OP14-020
Otama?
Otama
«searchers»
Perona?
Perona (1c)
«searchers»
Kin'emon?
Kin'emon
core Wano
Vander Decken IX?
Vander Decken IX
«pretty standard»
Kawamatsu?
Kawamatsu
pitch per Decken
Kouzuki Oden?
Kouzuki Oden
«the Odens»
Dracule Mihawk 6c?
Dracule Mihawk (6c)
no split 2/2 con Law
Perona 5c?
Perona (5c)
«the Mihawk and the Perona»
Jewelry Bonney1?
Jewelry Bonney "Stun"
«this slot»
Shanks?
Shanks (10c)
solo il 10c
Law & Bepo?
Law & Bepo
«don't need five» bombe
You Can Be My Samurai!!4
You Can Be My Samurai!!
«four for sure»
Rad Beam3+?
Billion-fold "Rad Beam"
«this many Rads», prima 2
Electrical Luna?
Electrical Luna
«a lot of Lunas»
Coffin Boat2
Coffin Boat
prima 1
Sam · dal video — evidenze sui conteggi
  • 00:41:00 "I think you should play four Samurai for sure. You really want to see multiple of them in most games and if you can't convert them you can pitch them to Mihawks."
  • 00:22:23 "In earlier versions of my deck I was playing two Rad Beams and ten 2ks and one Boat… the other thing I could see happening is that you cut a Rad Beam"; "I could be convinced to play a third [Boat]".
  • 00:29:23 Sul numero di bombe: "I just don't think that you need five… what really matters is that you draw two" (a volte ne basta una). ⚠️ Le note scrivono «four copies»: Sam non dice mai "four".
  • 00:07:13 Stun Bonney: "you could put tech for that matchup in this slot" (singolare).
  • 00:31:12 Niente 7c né 9c Shanks: "you don't get to play either seven or nine Shanks because of Decken existing, they just trade too well with you. The nine is functionally interchangeable with the Decken anyway… the seven you shouldn't be willing to turn sideways."
  • 00:38:13 Split 2 Law / 2 Mihawk? "All of the cards in this deck are worse with Law than with Mihawk except for the stun Bonney."
  • 01:54:57 Quanto è buona la lista? "Very good in the mirror… very good vs everything except for Sabo, and I don't feel that bad about the Sabo matchup. This is the most you can build for the mirror within reason."
Sam · Wano Core

Sam considers the Wano engine largely unchanged and non-negotiable. The core gives Mihawk: reliable early development · card selection · Samurai conversion · access to multiple 6-cost plays · Perona and Oden lines · filtered access to major threats · a consistent way to generate value over a long game.

She is very high on playing four Samurai effects. The deck wants to see several in a game, especially in the mirror where extra draws, extra filtering, and card economy are major sources of edge. If Samurai becomes unusable late, it can still be pitched through Mihawk filtering. That makes it much less punishing to play four copies.

La lista vista nel video: «17hawklaw»

Sam · frame del video (miniatura YouTube)
Frame del video: decklist 17hawklaw in OPTCGSim
Frame della sessione (OPTCGSim, file «..17hawklaw», 51/51 con il leader). Conteggio ricavato dalle pile.
Dracule MihawkL
Dracule Mihawk
OP14-020
Otama4
Otama
OP07-022
Perona (1c)4
Perona (1c)
OP12-034
Kin'emon4
Kin'emon
ST32-001
Vander Decken IX4
Vander Decken IX
OP06-033
Jewelry Bonney 2
Jewelry Bonney "Stun"
OP07-026
Kawamatsu4
Kawamatsu
OP12-023
Yasopp4
Yasopp
OP17-031
Kouzuki Oden4
Kouzuki Oden
ST32-002
Trafalgar Law (6c)4
Trafalgar Law (6c)
OP13-031
Shanks (10c)3
Shanks (10c)
OP17-022
Law & Bepo1
Law & Bepo
ST24-004
You Can Be My Samurai!!4
You Can Be My Samurai!!
OP01-055
Billion-fold 3
Billion-fold "Rad Beam"
OP06-038
Electrical Luna3
Electrical Luna
OP08-036
Coffin Boat2
Coffin Boat
OP14-039
Cos'è questa lista. Il file si chiama «17hawklaw» ed è la versione Law + Yasopp come la costruisce il gruppo di Sam (probabilmente mostrata quando parla della «more common Law+Yasopp build», 00:11:13): rispetto a Impact ha 2 Stun Bonney e 3 Luna al posto delle 2 For Fun, e 3 Shanks invece di 4. Non è la lista personale di Sam (che gioca 6c Mihawk + 5c Perona al posto di Law + Yasopp), ma dato che «47 of these cards are the same» i conteggi del core (4 searcher ×3, 4 Decken, 4 Kawamatsu, 4 Oden, 4 Samurai, 3 Rad Beam, 3 Luna, 2 Boat, 1 Law/Bepo, 3 Shanks) sono la miglior indicazione disponibile anche per la Versione B. Il frame è l'unico visibile: lo stream video non è scaricabile senza runtime JS, quindi la lista Mihawk + Perona resta ricostruita.

Confronto shell: Mihawk + Perona vs Law + Yasopp

Mihawk 6c+Perona 5coppureLaw 6c+Yasopp
Sam · Mihawk vs Law Shells

A major list decision is whether to play the Mihawk plus Perona shell or the Law plus Yasopp shell.

Sam · Mihawk plus Perona (la sua scelta)

Sam prefers Mihawk plus Perona. Advantages:

  • Mihawk is larger.
  • Mihawk's developed body remains standing.
  • A standing body is much harder for the opponent to contest.
  • Mihawk is better in the mirror.
  • Mihawk is better into larger-bomb decks such as Kaido.
  • Mihawk filters bricks out of hand.
  • The filtering effect can be equivalent to, or better than, Law's extra card advantage.
  • Perona remains strong into Sabo.
  • Perona protects against KO patterns.
  • Perona can stop two relevant 6k attacks in Sabo board states.
Sam · Law plus Yasopp (l'alternativa)

Law plus Yasopp is a valid alternative shell. Advantages:

  • Yasopp is strong on exactly five DON!!.
  • Yasopp attacks, rests, then stands again.
  • Law can place Yasopp without leaving the new body sideways.
  • Yasopp can attack opposing small bodies and help contest board.
  • The shell improves some Sabo scenarios.

Concerns:

  • Law is worse than Mihawk in the mirror.
  • Law relies more on a good opener and surviving one-drops.
  • Law and Samurai have anti-synergy because Samurai can expose the one-drops Law needs.
  • Law does not filter bricks.
  • Yasopp is not as valuable in all matchups as it appears.
  • Yasopp is weak into Ace Luffy because Ace's bodies are too large for Yasopp to contest.
  • Perona has meaningful Sabo interaction that Yasopp does not replicate.

Sam's bottom line is that Law is mainly played to gain Yasopp access. She does not believe Yasopp is good enough to justify replacing the stronger Mihawk plus Perona package in her current build.

Sam · dal video
  • 00:08:00 "Not everyone is playing the six cost Mihawk anymore"; Yasopp is the reason people play Law. Mihawk is "really substantially better than the Law in the mirror" and vs big-bomb decks like Kaido because the Law body ends sideways and gets contested; Mihawk's filter cycles a brick, Law's +1 keeps it.
  • 00:08:49 Yasopp: "you get to fight for their character and draw a card, it's a free rest target, and it's not an incidental stun victim"; Law→Yasopp leaves no sideways body to contest. "Probably the best thing you can summon on exactly five, but that's not that important."
  • 00:12:48 Anti-sinergia Law/Samurai nel dettaglio: when you Samurai your ones they become vulnerable to your opponent's ones, and if they get cleared you can't play Law, so you don't get to resolve the Samurai; Law also picks up a body from your board, so on 6 DON you don't get to Samurai before you Law.
  • 00:14:23 Josh (Impact) is "really high on" the Law/Yasopp list; his upcoming Mihawk content will focus on it.
  • 00:32:50 Mihawk+Perona è solo per il mirror? Mainly, but Mihawk is also just the better card: "the body from the Mihawk is always standing and the Mihawk is bigger".
  • 00:37:13 Yasopp è "terrible" vs Luffy Ace because their bodies are all +3 so you cannot contest them.
Sintesi: quando preferire quale shell
  • Law + Yasopp se ti aspetti tanto Sabo, Rocks e Robin: Yasopp fa board control sui 2k/4k presto, gioca attorno a Shiki rialzandosi, e rialza Shanks vs 10 Mom (Impact vs Kaido/Rocks).
  • Mihawk + Perona se ti aspetti tanto mirror, Kaido e Ace Luffy: il corpo resta in piedi, filtri i brick, Perona blocca 2 attacchi da 6k e "float" in un altro 5 costi se muore; Sam stima che rinunci solo a «a couple points into Sabo».
LawSopp vs HawkRona · dove sta il vero disaccordo
  • Il costo di setup di Law. Il disaccordo di fondo non è «Law è forte o debole?», ma se il suo costo di attivazione — aprire bene e far sopravvivere gli 1 costi — sia un rischio reale (Sam) o una parte prevista e gestibile del motore (Impact). Contro i mazzi che rimuovono efficientemente gli 1 costi l'argomento strutturale di Sam si rafforza; se invece dai molto peso all'interazione presto sul board, la valutazione di Impact su Yasopp diventa molto più convincente.
  • Yasopp risolve il problema del corpo riposato. La costruzione LawSopp risolve apposta il difetto classico di Law («lascia un corpo di lato»): il deployment preferito da Law è proprio Yasopp, che entra riposato ma si rialza da solo a fine turno, rendendo il turno Law molto meno vulnerabile. Per Impact è il centro della build; per Sam un aiuto vero ma non decisivo nel mirror.
  • Due modi di usare Perona 1c. Tutte e due le scuole la considerano fondamentale, ma per motivi diversi: Sam ne valorizza l'utilità indipendente (search e filtro che funzionano da soli), Impact l'accesso ripetuto via bounce di Law — bounce Perona → gioca un 5 costi → replay → dig verso Shanks, Luna, eventi e follow-up. È il modo in cui LawSopp guadagna ceiling e profondità di pescata.
  • Brick management. Entrambi ammettono che il Mihawk verde bricka: Sam si affida al filtraggio incorporato (il 6c Mihawk butta fuori il brick attivamente), Impact al cycling attivo — Samurai, Coffin Boat, Kin'emon, DON!! del leader e i loop Law/Perona. Corollario di Sam: una carta in più non è sempre meglio, se il brick originale ti resta in mano. Corollario di Impact: la densità di pescate trova i pezzi non cercabili (Decken, Yasopp, Boat) e mantiene il follow-up.
  • Samurai. Resta centrale per entrambi, ma Sam ci vede una potenziale anti-sinergia — Law vuole un corpo da bounceare, e il Samurai può esporre o consumare proprio i corpi che servono a Law — mentre Impact la gestisce coi DON!! in eccesso per convertire i Samurai senza incastrarsi.

Scelte di lista spiegate (Sam)

Vander Decken

Vander Decken IX+Kawamatsu
Sam · Vander Decken

Vander Decken has become close to standard in OP17 Mihawk. Its main purpose is to improve the Sabo matchup. Why it matters against Sabo:

  • Sabo creates a board full of Giant-enabled bodies.
  • Its big units can become difficult to contest conventionally.
  • Vander Decken lets Mihawk remove or answer an important body.
  • It gives Mihawk a cleaner way to interact with the Sabo board before it becomes overwhelming.

Vander Decken is also incidentally good in the mirror: if the opponent plays Shanks, Mihawk can interact with the Shanks; if the opponent plays a major body, Decken provides a practical answer; it supports Shanks plus Luna lines by removing the character that matters most. Sam does not describe Decken as the only mirror plan, but it is a major tool in the most common Shanks endgame.

Sam · dal video — la build senza Decken (assente nelle note)
  • 00:15:11 Alternativa teorica: play Stun Bonneys and Law/Bepos and not the Shanks/Decken package. In the mirror you Bonney them off Shanks, then play Bepo. In non-mirrors Bepo "does a similar thing to Luna" (invalidates their board, though their board still contests yours), and a second Bepo stacks with the first. Vs Rocks the Bepo game is "for sure worse than the Shanks game" but Mihawk stays ahead; Bepo is "for sure very good vs Sabo". Cutting Decken frees space for more counter events / diversified fives. "Something we will explore more in the next couple of days."
  • 00:41:00 Forma di quella lista: more total sixes (some Laws in addition to Mihawks) so you "double summon every game" — five-drop on 5, Mihawk body, then Law→Bonney — plus more Laws and more events.
  • 00:16:48 Q: Shanks/Decken non è meglio vs yellow e Kaido? For sure better into Kaido; not meaningfully into yellow (Bonney their first 10-drop turn, swing your board, Bepo next turn: they have one turn to kill a 7k leader). "Without Decken for sure you will lose to Kaido", but if everyone plays Decken, Kaido gets worse and less popular.

Shanks e Luna

Sam · Shanks

Shanks is the defining OP17 Mihawk bomb. Its role is not merely to remove a body. Its real value is that it creates a board state where Luna becomes a mass tempo swing.

Sam · Luna

Luna is now much more important than it was in OP16.5. In the old Law/Bepo-focused Mihawk endgame, the opponent's board often already struggled to attack into a large leader. Stuns were less necessary. In OP17:

  • Shanks rests the opposing board.
  • Luna freezes the entire group.
  • Mihawk gets a tempo turn without taking meaningful return pressure.
  • The opponent often cannot make up the lost turn because Mihawk's board is already attacking for large numbers.

Luna is not merely defensive. It is a card that converts Shanks from a strong threat into a game-ending tempo package.

Sam · dal video
  • 00:27:23 The Luna trigger "has some incidental value too".
  • 01:41:39 Vs Kaido: "Lunas are very uniquely bad in this matchup — you are generally trying to pitch it away" (al massimo Luna solo il King per non morire).
LawSopp vs HawkRona · Shanks, Luna, Decken e i freeze

Sulle bombe le due scuole sono quasi sovrapponibili. Entrambe vedono in Shanks il motivo per cui l'endgame OP17 è drasticamente più forte delle versioni precedenti, e in Vander Decken una risposta premium ai personaggi grossi (7-8+ DON!!), non un removal generico — tanto che per Sam ha reso sconvenienti anche i vecchi 7c/9c Shanks. La sfumatura: Sam legge Shanks+Luna soprattutto come interazione da mirror (Shanks rende il board avversario vulnerabile ai freeze), Impact come pattern di chiusura universale (congela il board mentre Shanks spinge danno e prepara il letale). Sui freeze c'è pieno accordo: comprano il turno che ti serve per uccidere, non prolungano la partita — nessuno dei due vuole tornare ai loop di controllo alla OP14.

Stun Bonney

Jewelry Bonney OP07-026
Sam · Stun Bonney

Sam is testing Stun Bonney as mirror tech. The key use is simple: Stun Bonney can take the opponent off its Shanks turn.

In the mirror, the player going second often has the natural advantage of playing Shanks first and then using Luna to punish the opponent's board. Stun Bonney gives the going-first player a way to disrupt that timing. Why Bonney is playable even in a Mihawk build:

  • Law into Bonney creates a body that often enters sideways anyway.
  • That body can be removed by Luna, combat, or other interaction.
  • The difference between Law plus Bonney and standalone Bonney on the relevant turn may be smaller than it appears.

The card improves the mirror and has incidental value into yellow Big Mom decks. Against yellow Big Mom decks, Stun Bonney can stop their first major Big Mom turn. Those decks frequently have little productive to do if they are taken off their first important curve turn. Sam is not fully certain that Bonney is mandatory. It is an active testing choice, but she has been happy with its mirror role.

Come funziona (Sintesi)

OP07-026 Jewelry Bonney (5c 6000): «Up to 1 of your opponent's rested Character or DON!! cards will not become active in your opponent's next Refresh Phase». Giocata sul tuo turno a 9 DON!! su un DON!! riposato dell'avversario, il turno dopo lui si rialza con 9 DON!! invece di 10: niente Shanks. Nel video 00:31:12: spegnere il 10 costi di Rocks "is good, but that's not why it's there"; Bonney non fa nulla vs Sabo (01:15:54).

LawSopp vs HawkRona · la distinzione pratica più grossa

Il confronto tra le liste indica proprio qui la differenza più concreta: per Sam la Stun Bonney è la major innovation che ripara la debolezza strutturale del mirror andando primo — nega all'avversario il turno Shanks e inverte chi arriva per primo alla bomba; nella lista standard pubblicata da Impact e nel suo piano matchup, invece, non è un elemento centrale. Se ti aspetti un torneo pieno di mirror, questo è lo slot che pesa di più nella scelta. ⚠️ Aggiornamento dalla video-lezione di Impact (1 set 2026): anche Impact ora gioca 2 Stun Bonney (lista dalla top-4 cinese, al posto di For Fun e Law&Bepo), la chiama «broken» e prevede che la build Perona verrà «gapped» dal pacchetto Bonney+Law — la differenza tra le due scuole su questa carta si è di fatto chiusa.

Law & Bepo

Law & Bepo
Sam · Law/Bepo Count

Sam plays Law/Bepo as a second bomb rather than the entire deck's primary endgame. She does not believe four copies are necessary. ⚠️ nel video dice «I just don't think that you need five» — mai "four" Why:

  • The first Shanks package is difficult to replace.
  • If Shanks does not end the game, Law/Bepo is an efficient second bomb.
  • Law/Bepo can replace a complicated multi-card follow-up sequence.
  • It stuns Shanks.
  • It invalidates the rest of the board by raising the leader.
  • It can preserve enough hand to survive the turn after Shanks plus Luna.
  • It gives the player another route to put the opponent to zero.

In many games, one Shanks turn puts the opponent at one or zero, and the second bomb is only needed when the first Shanks turn does not end the game.

Sam · dal video
  • 00:19:57 Because other people are not playing Bepo, once zeroed they have no way to survive your jam "except Law block stuff", and even without DMG you can Oden the Law; from their perspective you could also have Shanks, which interacts with anything on board.
  • 00:29:23 "You need to draw two [bombs]. Sometimes you get away with one." Law is "a more consistently good second bomb because of how many things you need to pair with the Shanks."
  • 01:58:19 Recap: "good as your second bomb in most matchups."
Impact · Slide 21 (estratto)

Law and Bepo can extend the game an extra turn while developing 1 additional attacker. Good way to punish people who are playing around Shanks (swinging with everything). Law and Bepo cannot extend the game forever anymore due to Shanks + Decken stuff in the mirror so that's why we don't build our deck around it anymore, however I've really liked the 1 copy.

Peso diverso, stessa carta. Dal confronto LawSopp vs HawkRona: Sam dà a Law & Bepo più peso strategico nel mirror — la «seconda bomba» compatta che sostituisce una sequenza difensiva multi-carta e compra un turno intero; per Impact è un'estensione potente ma secondaria, la one-of che serve quando ti manca esattamente un turno. Su una cosa concordano in pieno: non è più l'identità del mazzo.

Coffin Boat

Coffin Boat
Sam · Boats

Sam plays fewer Boats than previous Mihawk builds. Reasoning:

  • The current deck contains fewer events.
  • Shanks and other expensive middle-game cards naturally use more DON!!.
  • There are fewer turns where the deck simply has spare DON!! to convert an event.
  • 2k counters are often more valuable than a Boat in the mirror.
  • The major value of Boat is now its cantrip effect, not constant event conversion.

She could be convinced to play a third Boat, but she does not think Boat is as essential to OP17 Mihawk as it was to the event-heavier OP16.5 version.

⚠️ Le note invertono il ragionamento. Nel video (00:21:34) Sam dice: "without the more expensive cards in the middle of your game like the Shankses, the seven and nine, it is just very easy for you to have DON open for you to convert the Rad Beams" — cioè senza i 7c/9c Shanks hai più DON!! liberi, quindi il DON!!-cheating dello stage serve meno; il secondo motivo è che ci sono molti meno eventi. Nel Q&A (00:58:07): "I would always play the Boat unless you need the DON for something else. You can always play the Boat after you refresh with your leader, so it doesn't take you off your curve" — solo i turni Luna lo impediscono.
Differenza secondaria ma reale. Nel confronto tra le liste la Boat è uno dei pochi slot dove le due filosofie si vedono a occhio nudo: Impact la include esplicitamente come infrastruttura di card-flow e brick management (assieme a Samurai e Kin'emon); Sam è più bassa sulla densità Boat/eventi rispetto alle build vecchie, perché il deck ha molti meno eventi da convertire (per il motivo esatto detto a voce, vedi la ⚠️ qui sopra).

Rad Beam (Billion-fold)

Billion-fold World Trichiliocosm
Sam · Rad Beam

Rad Beam remains a core card because it defends the board. Sam's distinction:

  • Most 3k events are mostly defensive life tools.
  • Rad Beam can defend both life and key characters.
  • The most important event turns often happen in the midgame when the opponent tries to contest a character.
  • Saving a key body can create several future attacks and prevent the opponent from regaining tempo.

She therefore wants multiple Rad Beams even if she is playing fewer Boats.

Sam · dal video
  • 00:22:23 Nel mirror i colpi da una carta a metà partita si contrano con i 2k; l'avversario "is mostly not swinging eights at you in the middle of a game" perché sviluppa, cerca, fa Samurai e tiene DON!!: pochi spot in cui Rad Beam batte un 2k.
  • 00:26:35 "Most of the reason that there are this many Rads in my deck": in the middle of the game your opponent will try to contest your character and you get to save it with a Rad Beam — "that's just not true of any of the other events".
  • 00:40:13 Tagliare 2 eventi per Zoro 2k? No: "you do care to resolve multiple Rad Beams per game".
Nickname. "Rad Beam" (Sam) e "Billions"/"Billionfold" (Impact) sono la stessa carta: The Billion-fold World Trichiliocosm OP06-038 — +2000 al leader o a un personaggio, +2000 in più se hai 8+ carte riposate: la versione verde di Radical Beam!! (OP01-029), da cui il soprannome.
Filosofia dei 2k. Dal confronto tra le liste: HawkRona dà molto valore alla densità di counter 2000 «ordinari», perché nel mirror tanti attacchi sono colpi da una carta — è la difesa affidabile di metà partita. LawSopp ragiona più sul conteggio totale dei brick e sulla conversione attiva delle carte scomode: eventi e counter vanno usati e "intrecciati" fuori dalla mano prima che la intasino.

Tech e carte scartate

Sam · Why Not Stronger, For Fun, or DMG?
I Know You're Strong (Stronger)For FunDead Man's Game

Stronger

Sam thinks Stronger is poor. Why:

  • It does not stun enough bodies.
  • Mirror boards are often four to five wide.
  • Luna is dramatically better at stopping the board.
  • In many cases, using Stronger saves a similar number of cards as a normal counter event.
  • It does not defend key bodies in the way Rad Beam does.

For Fun

For Fun has become less reliable. Why:

  • Players now play around it because they do not want to be punished by Luna.
  • Mihawk and Oden frequently freeze or remove the most appealing target.
  • Shanks no longer guarantees the same easy For Fun setup that it once did.
  • Sabo can sometimes present Zoro or other cards that do not line up well.

For Fun may still be playable, but Sam does not see it as a major priority in her current shell.

DMG

Sam thinks DMG is less necessary now. Why:

  • The mirror often ends through zeroing the opponent with Shanks pressure.
  • Mihawk can frequently create lethal without needing a dedicated DMG finish.
  • Red-Green, the matchup where DMG mattered most, is not expected to be a major part of the format.
  • Other players are also playing fewer events, reducing the need for DMG-based lethal lines.
Sam · dal video — altre carte rifiutate
  • 00:24:12 "The other 3K events I think are really bad. The main one that people play is Stronger… you just need to stun more things than two, in the mirror boards are four or five wide"; 00:27:23 "you essentially never care to counter with the Stronger event".
  • 00:25:00 For Fun: "you don't get to force it to happen like you did with seven Shanks"; vs Sabo "they can just present Zoro and you don't get to Fun their guy".
  • 00:25:48 DMG: "the DMG lethal thing doesn't occur that much anymore… you zero your opponent and it's impossible for them to counter"; Red-Green is "unplayable in the format".
  • 00:30:26 Hody: "not terrible, but you don't really need the extra Fishman… I'm just not really willing to play the brick."
  • 00:39:00 Zoro 2k: "would be good in the mirror, but the 2Ks that are here instead are too important"; its upside only exists when the opponent has few ones.
  • Smoker (tech di Impact) non viene mai nominato nel video.
Identificazione carte. "Stronger" = I Know You're Strong… So I'll Go All Out from the Very Start!!! OP13-040 (riposa 2 DON!!: fino a 2 personaggi riposati da 7c o meno non si rialzano / counter +3000). "DMG" = Demon Aura Nine Sword Style Asura Blades Drawn Dead Man's Game OP12-037 (riposa 3 DON!!: riposa 2 personaggi o DON!! avversari / counter +3000). "For Fun" = OP14-037 (riposa 3 carte: KO un personaggio riposato con 7000 base o meno / counter +3000).
Perché Impact tiene 2 For Fun (dalla slide Sabo)

«For Fun was another inclusion to help deal with Sauls as it is very costly to deal with 7000 power units otherwise. All these tools are here just to buy you extra time as this is one of our worst matchups.» — La differenza con Sam sta nel piano vs Sabo: board control (Impact) contro attacco in faccia (Sam).

Impact · dal video — i tech spiegati (1 set 2026)
  • Stun Bonney non è più «solo un tech possibile»: 00:13:54 «The new thing from the weekend is everyone's playing Stun Bonneys. So I'm trying Stun Bonneys myself» — e 01:49:21 «this Bonney card is broken. […] You only need to see one: if you see one, you can just put it back into play with Law» (mai 3 copie; lui gioca 2).
  • Hody Jones: 00:14:39 «Hody Jones might be a little bit better now that people are playing Stun Bonney, because you can go Hody Jones + Luna even if they Stun Bonney you. I still have to test it.»
  • 6c Smoker: 00:15:25 «Smoker was kind of my answer to the OP07 Bonney: if you play a Smoker, they can't really Bonney your DON!!. […] This is just an idea.»
  • Dead Man's Game: 00:16:12 «Probably good to just include Dead Man's Game in a big tournament — it's always a good finisher when you have board. […] Dead Man for the black Teach, for sure.»
  • Zoro 2k / Kiku (anti-aggro, non nel pptx): 01:57:53 «If you have any trouble against the aggro decks, you can easily play the 2k counter Zoro. The floor is pretty high, it wrecks those decks in the early and it helps with Samurai»; 02:04:23 «maybe a single Kiku or a single Zoro — I don't think it is 100% necessary though.»
  • 6c Mihawk ibrido: 00:15:25 «I've seen a build that plays a single six Mihawk and a pair of Peronas. I think that is something that could possibly work.»
Mulligan · curve · piano di gioco · fondamentali

Gameplan primo e secondo

Le curve turno per turno sono di Impact (Law + Yasopp); le considerazioni di Sam sul primo/secondo riguardano soprattutto il mirror e valgono per entrambe le versioni (sostituisci "Law → Yasopp" con "Mihawk → Perona"). Games should end on the 2nd 10 DON turn.

Mulligan

Impact · Slide 10 — Mulligans

Going first

Perona Kinemon Stage Otama YCBMSamurai Yasopp

Going second

Perona Kinemon Stage Otama YCBMSamurai Yasopp Oden + Law

Cards you are generally looking for:

  • You're looking for the card draw pieces so you can structure your hand to play the game.
  • You're often trying to find with your searches / card draw a play for T3 (5 or 6 DON Turn) T4 (7 or 8 DON turn) and T5-6 (Shanks)
  • Because what you need is so wide to play throughout the game, you need to make sure you mulligan for your cards that give you extra cards / looks in the early game.
  • Perona is REALLY Important!! You want to bounce her with Law to continue to find follow up.
Versione B: Sam non dà una lista di mulligan; nel video dice che Law «relies more on a good opener and surviving one-drops», mentre con 6c Mihawk il turno 6 non dipende dall'avere ancora un 1 costo in campo (Mihawk gioca il 5 costi dalla mano). Le priorità di pesca di Sam sono nei principi in fondo a questa pagina.
Impact · dal video (1 set 2026)
  • 00:17:46 Yasopp non è cercabile → promuove i keep: «Yasopp isn't searchable. So if I see a hand with one or two searchers and a Yasopp, I'm pretty likely to keep.»
  • 00:20:56 L'anti-keep esplicito: «If your hand has Samurai and Law, you need one-drops. Otherwise it's not going to work.» E la regola-guida: «What you're looking for is a hand that does things. If your hand has a bunch of good cards but it doesn't actually do anything…» (00:21:46)

Andando primo

Impact · Slide 12 — Going First Curve

T1 Kin'emon 1 DON!!

Kin'emon

Kinemon ideally. Any searcher works but Kinemon costs 1 DON on turn 1 whereas it costs 2 DON on future turns.

T2 Perona / Otama → Samurai 3 DON!!

Perona/Otama→Samurai

Perona / Otama -> Samurai. Good turn to Samurai

T3 Oden / Yasopp 5 DON!!

Oden/Yasopp

Oden / Yasopp. Develop a 5 that draws a card. Convert additional Samurais / Stage using free DON from your leader skill.

T4 Law → Oden / Yasopp 7 DON!!

Law→Oden/Yasopp

Law -> Oden / Yasopp. Double develop. Hand neutral play. Replay Perona if you have it. Find a play for next turn.

T5 Law → Yasopp → Vander Decken / Law + Oden 9 DON!!

Law→Yasopp→Vander Decken

Law - Yasopp -> Vander Decken if you're playing a matchup with important 7-8 DON characters (8c Kata/Teach is a big one vs Robin), Law + Oden if you aren't. This is the ideal turn to cycle searchers and Samurais to find pieces for 10 DON turn.

T6 Shanks + Decken e/o Luna 10 DON!!

Shanks+Vander Deckene/oLuna

Shanks + Decken and/or Luna, depending on the matchup what you need, but no matter what you need Shanks. You can also use the free DON here to play searchers etc to find more plays if you don't need to Decken.

Andando primo nel mirror: il problema strutturale (Sam)

Sam · The New Mirror Problem

The player going first has a difficult structural issue. If both players develop optimally:

  • The going-second player reaches Shanks plus Luna first.
  • The going-first player may have a wide board.
  • Shanks rests the board.
  • Luna freezes it.
  • The going-second player attacks with a 12k Shanks plus additional bodies.
  • The going-first player can be pushed to zero.
  • Mihawk at zero has limited reliable ways to play another turn.

This is why leader life management has changed in OP17.

Sam · Stun Bonney as the Going-First Plan

Stun Bonney is the main experimental answer for the player going first. If Bonney prevents the opponent from playing Shanks on curve:

  • Their planned Shanks plus Luna line becomes unavailable.
  • Their 9-DON!! turn becomes awkward.
  • They may only be able to Perona a body or attack a single rested character.
  • They do not establish a major bomb.
  • The going-first player becomes the first player who can Shanks plus Luna.

The opponent may still send several attacks, so the Mihawk player must be willing to counter enough damage to survive. However, if the opponent cannot play Shanks, the Mihawk player can often safely go to one life because the opponent's follow-up is much weaker.

Sam · Going-First Pressure Plan

If Stun Bonney is unavailable, Sam recommends using the odd-DON!! turns to push life efficiently. On 9 DON!!:

  • Do not automatically play another 6-cost body.
  • The opponent will often Shanks plus Luna the board anyway.
  • The extra body may not matter.
  • Use the available DON!! to make larger attacks.
  • Play Perona to reduce the incoming attack count.
  • Push the opponent toward one or zero life before their bomb turn.

The logic is simple: if both players reach one life, the player who zeros the opponent first wins the initiative. The opponent then has to kill immediately. If the opponent cannot kill through your counter and leader power, you win the following turn.

Sam · Why 6-Cost on 9 Is Worse

The 6-cost body on 9 DON!! is less valuable than it was in OP16.5 because the opponent's Shanks plus Luna turn can invalidate the entire board. The player going first should often choose: Perona plus larger attacks · Stun Bonney plus development · more aggressive face pressure · a defensive event posture — instead of 6-cost development that is immediately frozen with the rest of the board.

Sam · dal video — la curva concreta andando primo
  • 00:50:00 Senza Bonney: five on 5 (gets frozen); six + five on 7; they Oden or Perona; on 9 play just a Perona (skip the six, because the whole board gets Shanks-Luna'd anyway) → 7 DON to attach to whatever can attack.
  • 00:48:21 La matematica del turno Bonney: if the second player went Mihawk→6 (or Mihawk→5), then Mihawk→another 5, only one of their characters is sideways, so with Bonney played you can contest only that one; they will have at least three attacks. Going to 1 is fine "unless you are dead to 10k+12k or 11k+12k from the leader and the Shanks" next turn.
  • 00:46:46 Perché Bonney fa male: the going-second player has been digging specifically to set up Shanks+Luna, not for hands that play against Bonney. 00:47:33 Their 9-DON recourse: Perona your standing bodies, maybe attack over one sideways body; they establish no bomb and you become the first to Shanks-Luna.
  • 00:50:50 After you zero them first: they Shanks-Luna you, you go Shanks-Decken(-Luna), and as long as you're not dead to their next lethal ("at best another Shanks, big number big number, like 11-12") you win. "It comes down to how many Samurai both of you were able to resolve."
  • 00:52:26 If the opponent Samurai'd two bodies on that turn, Bonney + Luna freezes three and "there's no damage coming at you, they're untapping with one attacker".
  • 01:01:25 Q (la "curva dispari"): she always forgoes the six on 9 DON. You can't really skip the six on 7 or the five on 5; 9 DON is the only place you reliably spend extra DON attacking; "it's really only one more DON". She will not play Otama "for no reason" on 7 or 9.

Andando secondo

Impact · Slide 13 — Going Second Curve

T1 Doppio 1 costo 2 DON!!

Kin'emon+Perona

Double 1 cost. Be sure to use ones that draw before you search to know what pieces you need.

T2 Searcher + primo Samurai 4 DON!!

Otama→Samurai

Continue using searchers. This is the first Samurai turn. Make sure to leave a character active for Law if they can actually clear your characters.

T3 Law + Yasopp 6 DON!!

Law→Yasopp

Law + Yasopp ideally. You can use your leader skill to then rest something, and then pressure the rested character creating a 2 to 0 board lead.

T4 Law + Oden 8 DON!!

Law→Oden

Another Law, ideally with Oden on this turn so you can stun a relevant attacker while pushing with your other 6k bodies and excess DON to make good attacks.

T5 Shanks 10 DON!!

Shanks+LunapoiLaw & Bepo

Shanks. From here on out you're playing Shanks. Recognize when it is your last turn, then you can play the single Law and Bepo to extend the game 1 more turn if necessary. Make sure to count how many turns you need to actually end the game.

Andando secondo nel mirror (Sam)

Sam · Going Second

Sam prefers going second in the mirror. The normal going-second progression remains powerful:

  • Develop a 6-cost body on 6. ⚠️ le note scrivono «65-body»: nel video è "a six drop on six and then a six drop on eight"
  • Develop another 6-cost body on 8.
  • Reach Shanks timing first.
  • Luna the opponent's board before they can execute their own Shanks turn.

Going second gives access to the first major tempo bomb and naturally creates better curve efficiency.

Sam · dal video
  • 00:43:34 Perché six-on-6 / six-on-8 regge: if you assume the opponent Odens you on 7, only one of your units is sideways on 8, so the second six-drop still converts.
  • 00:54:48 Going second: "six on 6, six on 8, Shanks is very easy to replicate". If Bonney becomes popular, you need Perona or Perona+Luna turns of your own on 9 DON; you can also Bonney them back ("they still will not be able to play Shanks, so you are still ahead").
  • 00:58:07 Primo o secondo nel mirror? Second, "for sure".

Early / Mid / Late game

Impact · Slide 19 — Early Game Plan
  • Draw cards and find pieces.
  • Search for 5-6, 7-8, 9-10 DON Turns. Make sure you don't take excess pieces. Make sure you spend card draw and searches to find and complete your curve.
  • Take early damage to draw additional cards as you are a combo heavy deck and are looking for pieces as you have many moving parts.
Impact · Slide 20 — Mid Game Plan
  • Establish your attackers across 5-9 DON turns. These 6K bodies will convert to 7K swings with the free DON from your leader ability.
  • Cycle any additional searchers with extra DON on the 7-8-9 DON turns. Make sure you're set up for the late game.
  • Cycle towards Shanks combos and counter events to survive.
  • Pressure your opponent. Make it so you need as few Lunas / Shanks as possible if you can't find all of them to close the game out. Try to prepare for 1 extra turn than you think you'll need.
Impact · Slide 21 — Late Game Plan
  • Use Shanks combo to disable opponent's boards while pushing damage.
  • Try to end the game in 1 to 2 turns. Shanks is the best finisher the game has ever seen. Use it wisely.
  • Law and Bepo can extend the game an extra turn while developing 1 additional attacker. Good way to punish people who are playing around Shanks (swinging with everything). Law and Bepo cannot extend the game forever anymore due to Shanks + Decken stuff in the mirror so that's why we don't build our deck around it anymore, however I've really liked the 1 copy.
Impact · Slide 15 — How to Play Deck
  • Use early game to dig for pieces and find more continuing card draw and follow up plays.
  • Use mid game to establish attackers. Use free DON to convert more card draw spells / stages. Try to push a damage every turn with the leader skill.
  • Use the later turns to develop Shanks. Try to time your Lunas with however many turns you think the game will last. Shanks + push a bunch of 7s is also an incredible turn. Why is Shanks a 5 cost 12000 rusher in Mihawk? Unreal.
  • Set up wins by aggressively pushing 7s and getting your opponent into Shanks kill ranges. Without a board you can play Shanks, tap down your stage / searcher and send a 10+12 swing. If it takes multiple Shanks to win, plan towards closing out games via multiple turns with multiple Shanks. This card is so broken lol.
LawSopp vs HawkRona · stesse fasi, accenti diversi
  • Early game: obiettivo identico — prima di tutto l'accesso alle carte (searcher, draw, Samurai). Impact è più esplicito sul prendere vita presto per pescare i pezzi combo; Sam sul preservare le risorse e preparare la curva giusta verso il pivot mirror/Shanks.
  • Mid game: Impact predica conversione di tempo senza tregua — 6k in campo che diventano 7k coi DON!! gratis, pressione sulla vita ogni singolo turno. Sam è più cauta sulla struttura delle risorse: sviluppa pressione mantenendo la mano, le soglie di counter e il board che servono al turno Shanks.
  • DON!! extra: entrambi li riconoscono come il vantaggio che definisce Mihawk. Impact li spinge verso il danno immediato (più searcher, Samurai e cycling dei brick); Sam li spende dove avanzano il life mapping o la gestione di eventi e difesa, evitando sviluppi di poco valore.
  • Board ideale: Sam vuole robustezza — corpi attivi stabili e una mano che regge il turno Shanks anche sotto pressione di counter (contando se quel board sopravvive davvero al pivot Shanks/Luna avversario); Impact vuole densità di attaccanti — un board largo di 6k appiccicosi che picchiano a 7k ogni turno. Da qui il peso che Impact dà a Billion-fold sulla protezione dei 6k: sono il ponte verso il letale di Shanks.
Impact · dal video (1 set 2026)
  • 00:40:14 La regola di cambio: «If you can convert one DON!! into two cards' worth of damage, it is a good trade. You could turn sixes into sevens. Just make sure you do it.»
  • 00:24:06 Il turno a 5 DON!! è IL turno di cycling: «This is a good turn to cycle all your searchers, because after the 10 DON!! turn you're going to spend all your DON!! — you don't have turns to convert your searchers in the future.»
  • 00:23:19 Psicologia dei 7k presto: «Your opponent is more likely to take these early hits when they're sevens. Almost all your swings are going to be sevens at some point anyway — if they take those early hits, they're more inclined to give you cards when they're already at two life.»
  • 00:09:17 La risposta standard agli 8-costi: «Eight-costs are super manageable: you can just go Yasopp down the eight-cost, Vander Decken, and then bounce the Vander Decken back with Law at some point to reuse it.»

Come chiude il deck

Impact · Slide 24 — How Does Deck End The Game
  • Ends the game with a Shanks + 5 extra DON to swing out.
  • Work your way backwards from there - how do we get in a position to win?
  • We Shanks + Luna / Decken to extend the game while also pushing a damage with a Shanks.
  • Before that - we need them in range of a 2 turn lethal with back to back Shanks.
  • We convert our board in the middle of the game into attacks into the leader to get additional life and cards.
  • Which means we need to build a board while pushing damage.
  • Use leader skill to push damage to get your opponent in 2 turn lethal range with leader swings / your board. End games quickly. Games should end on the 2nd 10 DON Turn. Can extend the game 1 more turn with Law and Bepo if necessary.
Impact · Slide 25 — Navigating Towards Win Con
  • Map out the damage you're dealing each turn.
  • Think about the game as a whole. Which turns you're dealing which damage. In Pokemon they call it Prize Mapping. In Riftbound they call it Point Mapping. In One Piece we just call it dealing damage.
  • Think about how you're getting that damage. T2 you're getting a damage. T3 you're using free DON from leader skill to push a damage. T4 you're doing the same thing. Maybe getting cards while doing so. Etc etc.
  • Take an extra turn than you think you'll need as you'll often need a turn to get the cards out of their hand once you've gotten all or most of their life. It isn't as easy as get them to 0 and win.
  • Don't go for risky lethals, most of the time Mihawk can survive their clapback as they have the "free" Rad Beams and Lunas etc every turn. Just use a turn to extract value and force them to go all in against you. Just make sure to put them in those positions when you actually have their attacks covered (count!)
Impact · Slide 26 — Turn Around Losing Scenarios
  • Losing scenarios are always winnable because of Shanks.
  • Use Shanks + Luna to get additional turns. Use Shanks to put you closer to the win condition.
  • No matter what, this deck's win condition is killing the opponent while they're at 0 with an unblockable swing (Shanks taps down all the blockers) so make sure you're pushing damage.
  • Try to extend the game additional turns with Law and Bepo, Law + Oden, etc. to get that extra damage with your leader swings.
  • Counter aggressively to buy yourself more time to push more damage.
Sam · Do Not Delay the Bomb Turn

On 10 DON!!, Mihawk should almost always play its bomb. Why:

  • Delaying lets the opponent play their bomb first.
  • The game becomes a race to zero the opponent before they zero you.
  • Shanks creates immediate 12k pressure.
  • Law/Bepo can compress multiple interaction effects into one card.
  • Waiting generally creates no real advantage.

The rare exception is a Stun Bonney plus another development line that prevents the opponent's entire bomb turn. In most games, however, Mihawk should simply play the 10-cost bomb.

01:04:36 Dal video: "Always slam the 10 drop on 10?" Yes, you cannot afford to delay; Bonney + another five on 10 is theoretical because it requires them to have cleaned up your board, "which doesn't really happen".

Impact · dal video (1 set 2026)
  • 00:27:54 Luna in base ai turni rimasti, con soglia: «If you think the game will last two turns, you just want to spam your Lunas. If you think the game is going to last longer than three turns, you might use your first Shanks to board clear or board control.»
Appunti della lezione · checklist da torneo

⚠️ Questa checklist compare solo negli appunti (sintesi del note-taker: nel video la slide finale è «Deck broken. Need nerf. Play till end.»). Resta un buon riassunto operativo della guida.

Before registering Mihawk, players should know: their exact mirror die-roll preference · their planned number of Shanks, Law/Bepos, Lunas, Bonneys, and defensive events · which slots are flex cards and what matchups they improve · their answer to Sabo's early board · their plan to deny Rocks' Newgate and Shiki board · their Kaido line for the first 10-cost boss · their Robin plan for Borsalino plus Giant · their Enel plan for one-drops and hand-rip Law.

During every match, players should ask: What is my win condition this game? · Does this turn need to develop board, control board, pressure life, or survive? · Which cards in hand do I realistically play in the next two turns? · Which cards are bricks and should be filtered? · How many attacks can the opponent actually send next turn? · Can I afford one more turn instead of taking a risky lethal? · Does my Shanks turn put the opponent to one or zero? · Can I Luna the board on the turn it actually matters?

Fondamentali

Impact · Slide 16 — Pitfalls Playing Deck
  • Not playing aggressively enough. You get three free DON a turn. Use them to push damage.
  • Not cycling bricks. Samurais and Coffin Boats need to get out of your hand aggressively. Kinemon in the later stages of the game can filter bricks on the 8/9 DON Turn or in combination with Shanks. Make sure you don't stuck on million bricks.
  • Not bouncing Perona with Law. You want to use Perona to find continuation or critical pieces (Billions, Luna) as Perona hits most of the deck.
  • Undervaluing board control. Yasopp their guy and jam it down is a very strong play in the early game.
  • Not getting event counter out of your hand. You will end up spending most of your DON. Make sure to use 1 a turn in the later stages of the game if you have Coffin Boat. If not, look for turns where they're likely to attack you for damage, and weave them in.
Impact · Slide 17 — How to Defend Life as Deck
  • In most matchups you can take fairly aggressively. You need combo pieces and you have the ability to stabilize games at 1-2 life fairly easily when you combine Luna / Billions / Bepo etc.
  • In the mirror - try to counter smaller hits as Shanks will swing too big to counter.
  • Make sure you don't set yourself up for losses. Don't take damage you don't plan on accounting for in future turns. If you think defending a 5 or 6 on this turn means you can take an 8 the next turn (like when they drop Linlin and attack with their triggers) then you should do it if it doesn't cripple your resources. Think about the whole game, not just this one turn.
Impact · Slide 18 — Defending Characters as Deck
  • For the most part - your 6K bodies sticking in the mid game is how you convert wins. Make sure to protect them. Most of the time they're bigger than your leader. Most of the time - Billion will keep them alive. Make sure to protect your board.
  • You can start letting pieces of your board die when you're scaling into Shanks, etc in the late game. Calculate if you're going to need the counter to stay alive vs having an extra 6k body to swing. Ask yourself if that body's necessary to win. Often times you'll win by dropping back to back Shanks anyway.
Sam · Life Management (mirror)

Mihawk cannot casually go to zero against Shanks Mihawk. Why zero is dangerous:

  • Mihawk has limited blocker access.
  • Law can be answered by Oden, Shanks, DMG, or other interaction.
  • The opponent can create a 12k swing on its bomb turn.
  • The opponent can freeze the board and remove the ability to defend through combat.
  • Once at zero, Mihawk may have no reliable way to survive a second large push.

Sam's guideline: try to be at least two life at the beginning of the opponent's 10-DON!! turn. Sometimes two is sufficient if Rad Beam and counter math cover their next turn. In many games, this requires countering more of the one-card hits in the middle game than OP16.5 Mihawk did.

00:44:22 Dal video: the bomb swing is now a 12 instead of the 8–9 you got with Bepo; at zero Mihawk "does not have any way to reliably prolong the game — all you can do is counter, you do not have blockers". 00:45:11 Whether you need more than 2 life "depends on whether you'll be able to counter out of their lethal if they send it on their 12-DON turn"; with Rad Beams, 2 is often fine.

Impact · Slide 22 — How to Filter With Leader
  • As a rule of thumb, try to think at least what you are going to use within the next 2 turns. Don't try and hold onto non-counter you don't see yourself playing within the next two turns.
  • When you are playing towards a specific gameplan - try to filter out cards that don't contribute to this gameplan.
  • When in doubt, discard non-counter before discarding counter. The deck plays a lot of bricks and it can be easy to get stuck on a lot of non-counter.
  • Try to make sure to not get stuck on plenty of events. Make sure you weave them in from time to time to avoid getting clogged up in the late game.
Impact · Slide 23 — Using the Leader Skill
  • Important to use the leader skill to push damage. As we are an aggressive leaning midrange deck, it is important to use those extra DON to convert damage since we don't want to play forever games with our opponents.
  • We also need to make sure we cycle Samurais and Coffin Boats with those extra DON so we don't get stuck on nothing but non-counter.
  • Calculate how many DON exactly you'll need for counter events. On average you want to spend 1 a turn, but think about how much damage they can actually do. Count their swings.
  • On the last turn, leave up as many defensive events as you can. Try to end on 3 if you don't need to Luna.
Sam · Rad Beam and Event Timing

The mirror has more turns where events can become stuck. If you use Shanks, Vander Decken, Luna you often spend all available DON!!. That means a Rad Beam held too long can become unusable. The practical rule:

  • Use Rad Beam on the turn before the all-in Shanks plus Luna turn if it saves a meaningful body or preserves enough life.
  • Do not hold every Rad Beam just because it looks valuable.
  • Plan one turn ahead: if the next turn uses all DON!!, convert your event now or it may remain dead in hand.
Su questo sono d'accordo. La gestione degli eventi difensivi è un vero skill test del deck per entrambe le scuole: Sam è intenzionale sui DON!! da lasciare su (i turni pieni Shanks/Luna li consumano quasi tutti), Impact conta i colpi effettivamente in arrivo, spende ~1 DON!! a turno per gli eventi quando serve e li "intreccia" fuori dalla mano prima che la intasino. Due formulazioni della stessa regola: pianifica l'evento un turno prima del turno all-in.
Nota sul "filtro": Impact filtra con il leader intendendo la scelta di quale carta riposare/ciclare (Kin'emon, Samurai, 6c Mihawk quando riposa pesca 1 scarta 1). Nella versione B il 6c Mihawk «filters bricks out of hand» ogni volta che attacca: per Sam questo vale quanto la carta in più di Law.
Impact · dal video — sequencing (1 set 2026)
  • 00:12:20 L'ordine completo di draw & search: prima i draw singoli, poi le ricerche dalla più stretta alla più larga — Stage → Kin'emon → Samurai → Otama → Perona: «I usually play Otama first because it has less hits. Then I play Perona after because it has a wider range. […] Samurai is second because the discard requires more information.» Eccezione dal gameplay: «Normally I would stage first, but I want to develop actual bodies — more important, so I can Law.» (01:23:48)
  • 02:04:23 Col primo searcher prendi (quasi sempre) un altro searcher: «With my first searcher, I most of the time take another searcher if I can. […] I made sure that I picked up a Kin'emon so that I had three one-cost characters, so that I could still Samurai and, even if they cleared both my guys, I still had a body for Law.»
  • 01:54:33 Riposare i 6k col Samurai va bene: «When is it bad to tap your 6k bodies with Samurai? If they're not going to attack, just do it. It's typically fine: they're bigger than your leader most of the time, you can defend them with an event.»
  • 00:46:46 Il ruolo reale di Kawamatsu: «Most of the time I skip playing the turtle. You have to be in a really sketchy position to have to put the turtle on the board» — di norma è counter in mano, non un corpo.

Principi generali (Sam)

Sam · Build for the Mirror

Sam's deckbuilding priority is mirror equity. Why:

  • Mihawk is expected to be extremely popular.
  • Mihawk is likely overrepresented among strong players.
  • Mihawk is likely overrepresented in top cut.
  • Losing the mirror repeatedly is unacceptable for a tournament deck.

Stun Bonney, Shanks, Luna, Vander Decken, and Law/Bepo all contribute directly or indirectly to mirror success.

Quanto pesa il mirror nella costruzione. È una vera differenza di priorità tra le due scuole: Sam è disposta a sacrificare un po' di vantaggio nei non-mirror per strumenti da mirror e consistenza — i flex slot si scelgono da lì. La guida di Impact si concentra invece sull'esecuzione della curva di pressione e della mappa del danno, che paga in tutti i matchup. Nessuna delle due ignora l'altro lato: è questione di dove metti i punti marginali.
Sam · Know Which Attack Matters

Before using DON!! for an attack, ask:

  • Does this swing force a real card?
  • Does this attack put the opponent at one or zero?
  • Does this remove a character that enables their board?
  • Does it create a two-turn lethal?
  • Is the DON!! better spent on Samurai, a searcher, Rad Beam, or a development?

Do not spend DON!! attacking merely because it is available.

⚠️ Questa sezione e la successiva «Search Priority» non sono dette nel video: sono una sintesi di chi ha scritto le note. Le riportiamo perché coerenti con quello che Sam dice sparso nella sessione, ma vanno prese come tali.
Sam · Search Priority (⚠️ sintesi delle note)

Mihawk should search based on the upcoming bomb turns.

In the mirror
  1. Shanks
  2. Luna
  3. Law/Bepo
  4. Stun Bonney, if it matters on the next turn
  5. Rad Beam, if an event needs to be converted before the all-in turn
  6. Samurai, if hand size and card access are the limiting resource
Against Sabo
  1. Perona
  2. Oden
  3. Shanks
  4. Law/Bepo
  5. Rad Beam
  6. A playable curve over a greedy bomb search
Against Kaido
  1. Oden
  2. Perona
  3. Rad Beam
  4. Shanks
  5. A plan to stop King
Against Rocks
  1. Perona
  2. Oden
  3. Shanks
  4. Luna
  5. Rad Beam
  6. Pressure over excessive reactive play
Sam · dal video — cosa dice davvero sulle pesche
  • 01:20:41 È raro mancare i pezzi tardi "because you target them with searches/Mihawk filters"; se manca Shanks gioca comunque Bepo (è buono da solo); se hai Shanks senza Decken stai correndo (Shanks-Luna). Presto è più comune mancare: play the next-best thing — "you win by making the best sum of actions".
  • 00:28:33 Attacchi in ogni matchup? "Yes", including Sabo, with caveats.
  • 01:03:00 I DON!! extra su 7 e 9 vanno su searcher o Samurai solo se la mano non è ancora "made"; serve anche counter.
Mirror · Sabo · Rocks · Kaido · Robin e Big Mom gialli · Enel · Ace Luffy · Black Luffy

Matchup

Per ogni matchup: la scelta primo/secondo, la slide di Impact (versione Law + Yasopp) e le note + il video di Sam (versione Mihawk + Perona). Dove le note non coincidono col video c'è una ⚠️.

Tabella riassuntiva

Sintesi
MatchupPrimo / secondoImpactSam
MirrorSECONDOGo 2nd. «This matchup is about damage.»Second "for sure". Il più importante; chi arriva prima a Shanks+Luna; Stun Bonney andando primo.
Sabo (Red/Black, Elbaph)SECONDOGo 2nd. «One of our worst matchups (still 45-55, with the techs at worst 50-50).»Worst major matchup, ~60% going second; "I don't feel that bad about it".
RocksSECONDOGo 2nd. «Extremely weak to Luna.»Strongly favored, particularly going second.
KaidoPRIMOGo 1st. «Ramp decks typically want to go first.»"The only matchup where you want to pick first"; "pretty chill", if they miss King you always win.
Robin / Big Mom gialliPRIMO (Impact)Go 1st. «The matchup is not good for Robin.»Favored; Robin is "the best yellow slop deck" and the most tedious (triple ramp).
EnelPRIMOGo 1st. Pressa una vita a turno.— non trattato
Ace Luffy (RG)SECONDO (Sam)— non trattato"I don't have a great answer"; favoured second; Perona "insanely good".
Black (Elbaph) Luffy—— non trattatoSame plan as Sabo but smaller attacks; always go face.
Impact · dal video — il campo dopo il primo weekend (1 set 2026)
  • 01:37:54 La fiducia (a metà tra serio e faceto, nei VOD): «I think every matchup is favored with Mihawk. I think Mihawk is unbeatable. […] I win like every mirror across every tournament when I play this deck.»
  • 01:56:57 Meta: «Kaido keeps going down and down in play rate because low-key the deck loses to Mihawk now.»
  • 02:00:12 Vs Teach (non coperto dalle slide): «People weren't putting their searchers on the board. You're supposed to put your searchers on the board against Teach — you can use your leader skill and swing five-five with your searchers.»
Mihawk

Mirror — Mihawk vs Mihawk

Vai secondoIl matchup più importante
Impact · Slide 28 — Vs Mihawk - Go 2nd
  • This matchup is about damage. Understanding how to deal damage and how to map damage across multiple turns is going to be the key to victory.
  • Drawing multiple cards in the early game will give you ammo to counter swings while also ensuring you have your curve. Resolving Samurais is very important in making sure you actually can win.
  • This matchup is very different to how it used to be played prior.
  • We play less overall stuns than before. Less Peronas means attacks will go through. When characters get to attack - you need to size the attacks with the goal of dealing damage, not extracting cards.
  • Good numbers to attack - 7000, the deck plays only 8 2000 counters and often puts Otama on the table. 8000 if they don't have a DON up to get a life or 2 cards. 9000 if they don't have 8 rested cards. 10000 to attack past Billionfold. 6000 attacks are OK but it is easy for the deck to produce 1000 counters. It is easy for this deck to fail 2K checks.
  • Follow the curve and gameplay instructions listed as this matchup doesn't deviate much from the plan. Get your opponent to 1 life to set them to 0 with Shanks and freeze their attackers with Luna, then you can do a huge swing with Shanks when they're at 0 and should kill them.
  • Try to counter smaller swings early. Don't get stuck on too many events as your free DON from leader can't always be held up in the late game, especially if you have to freeze their characters with Luna.
  • Luna is very important in the mirror. Try to find the copies with Perona / drawing for them, as the extra turns from Luna save you a lot of counter in the mid-to-late game. Games are won or lost by how many turns you can stall the game with Luna. That's why we included a Bepo to protect ourselves 1 turn from the 6000 power bodies by becoming an 8000 leader and disabling their Shanks.
Sam · Matchup Identity

The mirror is the most important matchup in OP17 Mihawk. Sam expects Mihawk to be: the most popular deck · the deck most likely to be present in top cut · the deck every serious Mihawk list must prepare to face repeatedly.

The mirror is no longer just a Law/Bepo war. It is now a race to:

  • Establish board.
  • Preserve life correctly.
  • Play Shanks first.
  • Use Luna effectively.
  • Prevent the opponent's Shanks turn with Stun Bonney.
  • Put the opponent to zero before they do the same to you.
Primo e secondo nel mirror

Le linee complete di Sam per il primo (Stun Bonney, pressure plan, niente 6 costi a 9 DON!!) e per il secondo (six on 6, six on 8, Shanks) sono nella pagina Gameplan, sezioni «Andando primo» e «Andando secondo». Qui sotto le parti specifiche del mirror.

Sam · Law/Bepo as the Second Bomb

Law/Bepo is especially useful after the first Shanks exchange. A common sequence:

  1. Opponent plays Shanks plus Luna.
  2. You survive with one or two life.
  3. Your board is frozen or partially invalidated.
  4. You play Law/Bepo.
  5. Law/Bepo stuns Shanks.
  6. Your leader becomes larger.
  7. Opponent's board cannot meaningfully convert.
  8. You spend one card instead of needing another Shanks, Vander Decken, and Luna combination.
  9. You preserve enough hand to survive.
  10. You counterattack and put the opponent at zero.

Law/Bepo compresses a multi-card recovery line into one card. That is why Sam still values it highly as a second bomb.

Sam · dal video
  • 00:58:59 Decken sul 7c Shanks avversario? Often yes: you're not just turning on your 6k bodies, you're killing a 9k that attacks you. Certainly going second: if they play the seven on 7, Decken it, because you're not going to Decken on 10 anyway (their 9-DON turn is a five or six+five). Going second you basically never Decken except if you need a second turn after your first Shanks and have no Bepo (then you Decken their Shanks). Going first also generally correct but less so if you're Luna-ing their board anyway.
  • 00:42:46 Early game: it's all about resolving Samurai and developing; "double-six games" decide the mirror.
  • 00:54:48 Pianifica i DON!! per Rad Beam: if you play the entire Shanks-Decken-Luna combo that takes all of your DON, so convert the Rad Beam the turn before.
LawSopp vs HawkRona · come le due liste vivono il mirror
  • Andare secondi: accordo pieno — la progressione del secondo (doppio sviluppo → Shanks) è la sequenza favorita per entrambe le scuole; segui la curva normale e usa le pescate presto per assicurarti counter e bombe.
  • Vita: Sam dà la soglia concettuale esatta (almeno 2 vite prima del loro turno a 10 DON!!, perché a 0 il deck non ha modi affidabili di sopravvivere); Impact dà la regola pratica sugli attacchi (contra i colpi piccoli presto: gli Shanks diventano troppo grossi da contrare). Sono le due metà della stessa regola.
  • Numeri d'attacco: è Impact a dare i breakpoint concreti — 7k di default, 8k se non hanno DON!! su, 9k se non hanno 8 carte riposate, 10k per passare Billion-fold. Il focus di Sam è il traguardo: metti a 0 tu per primo, conservando abbastanza counter per sopravvivere alla ritorsione.
  • Il divario vero è la Stun Bonney: per Sam ripara la debolezza strutturale di chi va primo (nega il turno Shanks avversario e ribalta chi bomba per primo); nel piano pubblicato di Impact non è centrale. In un torneo pieno di mirror, è la scelta di lista che pesa di più.
Sintesi mirror
  • Secondo: 6 costi a 6, 6 costi a 8, Shanks + Luna a 10. Se Bonney diventa popolare, prepara un turno Perona (+Luna) a 9 o ri-Bonney.
  • Primo: 5 a 5, 6+5 a 7, a 9 niente altro 6 costi: Stun Bonney sul loro DON!! (li togli da Shanks) oppure Perona + attacchi grossi per portarli a 1-0 prima della loro bomba.
  • Vita: almeno 2 all'inizio del loro turno a 10 DON!!; contra i colpi da 1 carta a metà partita (2k), Shanks colpisce troppo forte per essere contrato.
  • Numeri (Impact): attacca a 7000 (8 counter da 2k nel deck), 8000 se non hanno un DON!! su, 9000 se non hanno 8 carte riposate, 10000 per passare Billion-fold.
  • Seconda bomba: Law/Bepo dopo il loro Shanks+Luna comprime la risposta in una carta; oppure Decken sul loro Shanks se non hai Bepo.
Impact · dal video — le linee Stun Bonney e il counter calibrato (1 set 2026)
  • 00:47:33 Bonney sul tuo turno a 5 nega il loro 6-drop: «Would you play a Bonney to skip their six? Yeah, it's very important to do that. Especially because on the nine DON!! turn you can just Law back the Bonney, play it again» — e il loop nega anche Shanks: «Stun Bonney allows you to go: five DON!! turn, make it so they can't play a six on six, and then you can Law back the Bonney and deny them the Shanks too.» (02:02:37)
  • 01:30:35 Bonney invece del TUO 10-Shanks quando sei dietro nella race: «If he gets the 10 Shanks on me, I am going to be too far behind to 10-Shanks him back and be able to counter the last 10 Shanks. The Law-Bonney stuff let me push one more time.» Nei VOD un avversario concede con in mano Shanks-Shanks-Shanks-Luna-Luna dopo la Bonney sul DON!! (01:46:36).
  • 00:52:08 Il counter calibrato: «Usually your hand structure can't really afford to counter super early swings — you very often don't have the ability to counter the first six at your leader. But fourth life, after you've Samurai'd… third life for sure: you should be able to cover 6k swings with one card, 7k swings with one card.» E Luna quantificata: «Luna will often save you like four cards.» (00:52:56)
  • 02:03:24 L'ipotesi nuova sul die-roll: «Maybe an angle where you can make going first better with a bunch of Bonneys and Laws — I'm not 100% sold. […] You play the Perona build and you go first, you get invalidated a lot of the time.»
Sabo

Vs Sabo (Red/Black, Elbaph)

Vai secondoIl matchup peggiore
Jaguar D. SaulLoki
Impact · Slide 30 — VS Sabo - Go 2nd
  • Sabo is another type of midrange deck that revolves around planting a lot of 2/5000 power units that provide some sort of value. It punishes you for attacking with individual bodies because of Robin the amount of stats it can put into play can be overwhelming.
  • Yasopp was one of the cards put into the deck originally to help deal with the early characters from Sabo while not losing value. It is meant to board control the 2000 power characters before they have Giants in play. This reduces the amount of pressure coming back at you and gives you more time to extend to your Shanks + Vander combo to deal with their big characters.
  • Try to not put Otama on the table if you can help it, they're going to 2K check you often with their 6000 power weenies so I don't want to get caught without. Try to use other searchers, etc to resolve your Samurais.
  • Play for board control so that your Odens are more impactful, stalling their Lokis is ideal as you're getting the most value stunning 9000 power units that way.
  • For Fun was another inclusion to help deal with Sauls as it is very costly to deal with 7000 power units otherwise. All these tools are here just to buy you extra time as this is one of our worst matchups (still 45-55 btw, and with the techs I think it's at worst 50-50)
  • Use Yasopps to deal with Zoro ideally so that Vander Decken can land on important characters like Luffy / Loki.
  • If you can remove their only Giant then all their weenies fall immediately after.
  • The Sabo curve is fairly obvious what they're going to play. Try to leave up DON if possible on certain turns to protect yourself from 7000 power attacks with 1 card. It will be hard to block the 9000 power attacks later so making sure we can stop the 6000s and 7000s while we can is important. Be careful about bleeding life.
  • Very important to make sure you have a reasonable strategy to counterpunch them. You won't be able to fully stabilize but their defenses are weak so you are often able to 2 turn with Shanks back to back if you can get them to 2. If you aren't in range of dying (count lethals) - then do your best to set up a 2 turn kill.
Sam · Matchup Identity

Sam sees Sabo as Mihawk's worst major matchup. The matchup is more difficult when Mihawk goes first because:

  • Mihawk reaches its pivot bomb turn one turn later.
  • Sabo can build a wider board before Mihawk gets Shanks or Law/Bepo active.
  • Sabo's 6k attacks can repeatedly 2k-check Mihawk.
  • Sabo can use Giant lines, Saul, Loki, Luffy, and Brook to produce too many attacks. ⚠️ Brook non è mai nominato nel video (Sam cita Saul, Loki, Gravity Blade, Docking, 8c Luffy, Zoro, il blocker Jinbe, i 2 costi, i 12 costi)
  • Mihawk can be forced low before it gets to stabilize.

When Mihawk goes second, Sam believes the matchup is much easier because Mihawk reaches its bomb turn earlier relative to Sabo's board.

Sam · Yasopp Versus Perona

The Law/Yasopp build has more direct value into Sabo because Yasopp can rest a 2-cost body and attack it. However, Sam does not think this alone makes Law/Yasopp clearly superior. Perona is also strong:

  • It can stun two 6k bodies.
  • It protects against removal by replacing itself. ⚠️ nel video: "the Perona will float into something if it dies, so you can just let it die and summon an Oden" — è l'On K.O. che gioca un altro 5 costi
  • It can prevent two meaningful attacks when Sabo plays two 2-cost bodies plus Saul or Docking Station.
  • It can reduce Sabo's ability to attack in a coordinated wave.

The current Mihawk plus Perona build gives up some Sabo equity compared with Yasopp, but Sam does not think the sacrifice is large enough to abandon the stronger mirror shell.

Sam · Attack Versus Starve

Without Yasopp, Sam does not recommend fully starving Sabo. Why not:

  • Sabo can continue developing.
  • Its cards search, replace themselves, or create board value.
  • A full starve lets Sabo construct its ideal board.
  • Mihawk loses opportunities to create two-turn lethal pressure.
  • If Mihawk gets knocked low while starving, it may have no winning route because Sabo still has a board.

Her default is to attack Sabo. The preferred pattern:

  1. Deal the first damage.
  2. If Sabo turns a body sideways, attack that body.
  3. If Sabo lets the body die, continue attacking face.
  4. If Sabo defends the body, keep attacking face and let them spend their hand.
  5. Transition into a race once Sabo is low.

This gives Mihawk multiple win conditions: Sabo runs out of hand protecting the board · Sabo takes too much life and dies to Shanks · Mihawk clears enough Giant bodies to invalidate the board · Law/Bepo turns the board off and enables a two-turn lethal.

Sam · When to Attack Sabo's Board

Mihawk should attack Sabo's board when: a character is already rested · the attack does not require too much extra DON!! · the body is important to Sabo's Giant engine · the body is a 6k attacker that will create future pressure · killing it prevents Sabo from converting its board.

Mihawk should not attach DON!! merely to attack into Saul unless: Sabo's hand is already very small · killing Saul turns off the entire board · the attack prevents immediate lethal · you are removing the final Giant body that makes their next turn functional.

Sam · Why Attacking Helps Against Gravity Blade

Attacking Sabo throughout the game makes Gravity Blade less punishing. If Mihawk starves Sabo and Sabo resolves Gravity Blade: Mihawk may be at two life · Sabo may still be at five life · Mihawk's board is reduced · Mihawk has a hard time closing the life gap. If Mihawk has already attacked Sabo: Sabo is lower on life · Sabo has already spent counter · Mihawk's surviving bodies still threaten life · a Gravity Blade turn does not automatically erase the win condition · Shanks can still create a lethal turn.

Sam · Law/Bepo in the Matchup

Law/Bepo is strong against Sabo because Sabo often cannot play around it. Sabo expects Shanks and generally wants to use its board to attack. If it turns bodies: Law/Bepo can stun a key Giant or Loki · Mihawk gains leader power · Sabo's smaller bodies become much less effective · Mihawk can push lethal over two turns while holding enough DON!! to survive.

The key is that Law/Bepo is poor in a full-starve game. If Sabo remains at five life, gaining one extra turn does not solve the matchup. Attacking first makes Law/Bepo a real finisher.

Sam · dal video
  • 01:06:23 "Evidently the way I play the matchup is pretty different to how a lot of other people approach it" — il motivo è l'assenza di Yasopp, che permette di fare starve contestando i corpi.
  • 01:08:46 Leader di Sabo: "gains 1k when they're at three"; se hanno preso esattamente un danno sono a 4 e il leader colpisce più piccolo — uno dei motivi per cui lasciarli contrare per un corpo a 4 vite funziona bene.
  • 01:09:33 Come finisce una partita starve: clean early bodies, Shanks them, Decken the big guy; vs Saul + Loki, Decken the Loki and Shanks-attack over the Saul so all 12-costs are gone; then Sabo is "dead in the water" (8c Luffy has no rush). You only get this line when you starve; when you don't, they have too many cards to counter for medium bodies, so you go face.
  • 01:11:56 "You can get counter-breakpointed pretty easily in Mihawk" because Sabo 2k-checks constantly; if that happens while starving you have no recourse; "they Luffy you on nine and put you to zero". Attacking, you can still Shanks and send lethal in that spot.
  • 01:14:18 Perona a metà partita: they often have a couple of 5k bodies they didn't turn (or Oden stopped), then play another from Docking, and Perona freezes those and "saves you a lot of cards". Law/Bepo: "your opponent is never going to be playing around the Bepo because playing around it is a fool's errand when people are expecting Shanks".
  • 01:15:54 Bonneys "are generally quite bad in the matchup"; everything tedious happens going first; "when you get to play your bomb on five [going second] the matchup is quite easy"; ~60% going second.
  • 01:16:40 Starve o attacco, come decidi? Default: attack. Exceptions: if they mulligan and do nothing on 2 (not attacking decreases the chances of Saul on four) but only when her own hand is bad; and if they counter damage at 4 life (too early), she stops attacking face if anything else meaningful is available. Starving "burns too much value" because any slop of 2-drops becomes 6k bodies once they have a 12-cost.
  • 01:23:59 Sabo tiene i corpi in piedi? Attacking disincentivises that, but often they should still keep the single Saul up (so much of their board is invalidated when it dies to a Decken); once they have a Loki they can turn the Saul. 01:25:36 Oden sul grosso o sul piccolo? Freeze the weenie if you have Decken and accept the damage; freeze the bigger body only if you can't take the damage.
  • 01:59:05 Six-on-six vs Sabo? Yes: after one more damage their leader becomes a six anyway — "if the attack is going to resolve I would rather kill the body than deal the damage". Sabo-specific; vs Elbaph Luffy just race.
Sintesi Sabo: le due scuole
  • Impact (Law + Yasopp): board control presto. Yasopp riposa e uccide i 2 costi prima che arrivino i Giganti, Oden sui Loki, For Fun sui Saul, Decken su Luffy/Loki; niente Otama sul tavolo; tieni DON!! per i 7000 da una carta; punta al 2-turn kill con Shanks back-to-back.
  • Sam (Mihawk + Perona): attacca in faccia di default. Se girano un corpo, attaccalo; Perona congela i due 6k; non fare starve completo (Gravity Blade e counter-breakpoint ti puniscono); Law/Bepo chiude quando sono bassi. Vai secondo (~60%).
LawSopp vs HawkRona · Sabo è l'argomento di LawSopp

Nel confronto tra le liste, Sabo è l'argomento pratico più forte a favore di LawSopp: Impact lo identifica tra i matchup più difficili e ci costruisce contro apposta — Yasopp sui corpi piccoli, Oden sui pezzi ad alto impatto, Decken conservato per Luffy e Loki, countering attento, chiusura in due turni di Shanks. Sam riconosce che Yasopp migliora il matchup in modo significativo, ma non abbastanza da valere più del vantaggio nel mirror di HawkRona. Sul ruolo della carta sono d'accordo — gira un corpo avversario così puoi contestarlo tenendo il tuo attivo, e impedisce ai value bodies economici di Sabo di snowballare — ma divergono su quanto questo debba decidere la lista intera. Se il tuo campo è pieno di Sabo e di mazzi che crescono sui 2 costi, qui la bilancia pende nettamente verso LawSopp.

Impact · dal video (1 set 2026)
  • 01:03:16 Quando puoi affamarlo: «You can starve them at four life. It really just depends on how quickly you can turn the corner: Yasopp their first character, then Law-Yasopp, kill their next character — now you have three guys to their one, and you can Oden the one guy. If you win the board super early, kill them. If you're fighting for board, you're fighting for board.»
Rocks D. Xebec

Vs Rocks D. Xebec (Blue)

Vai secondoMolto favorevole
Captain JohnUsopp eventKyoShiki
Impact · Slide 29 — VS Rocks - Go 2nd
  • Rocks is a Slash Leader. Mihawk naturally defends for free, and extracts more counter just on character select. This is not auto-win by itself, but it is the difference of several cards throughout a game.
  • Rocks major weakness is that all of its primary attackers are 7 cost or less, so it is extremely weak to Luna. If Luna + Shanks combo didn't exist, this matchup wouldn't be so lopsided.
  • Rocks wins by dealing damage to you really aggressively and trying to "stall out" your Lunas with Captain John. Even if you get them to 0, Captain John can keep them alive. Shanks does tap down the Kyo, but Captain John protects it, so you can't get to it and Vander Decken. Combined with the "Usopp event" - it can guarantee another turn for the Rocks player. Even just a single Captain John can buy them an extra turn. Account for these extra turns and don't go "all in" with Luna too early. Bepo is great to buy you an extra turn if they are stalling with John without having to burn a Luna. If you realistically can't kill them through a Captain John - remove some of their attackers with either Vander Decken or just board control them with the Shanks. For the most part - extra turns benefit Rocks but if you remove all their attackers / their defensive units then they will die anyway.
  • Other than that - you get a lot of free damage because of the fact that your leader is 6000. When you refresh, you will be able to attack them for 7-9000 easily and push through their defenses with your leader.
  • Play around Shiki by not attacking with just 1 6000 power body at a time. Remove Shikis on sight with Vander Decken if they're not protected by a Kyo. Removing Kyos with Yasopps in the early game is also worth it a fair amount of the time to prevent the snowball. Yasopp does a good job of also being an attacker that "plays around" Shiki by restanding itself.
  • Attack Rocks for 7s when they don't have Newgate up. Attack them with your leader for 7 if they have Shiki up. Attack for 8s with characters or base numbers if they have Shiki up.
Sam · Matchup Identity / Rocks' Main Weakness

Sam considers Mihawk strongly favored into Rocks, particularly going second. Rocks has trouble interacting with Mihawk's board efficiently: Mihawk can play a 6-cost and a 5-cost body · both bodies often remain standing · Rocks cannot contest them except through very specific Gloriosa lines · if Rocks spends a Gloriosa turn, it is often not developing its own Newgate, Shiki, or Linlin engine · Mihawk's board keeps pressuring while Rocks falls behind on tempo.

Rocks wants to establish characters that create ongoing value (Newgate, Shiki, Linlin, Kyo, other 3k-counter and card-conversion bodies). Mihawk is difficult because it pressures Rocks' bodies and freezes its board before those cards can convert. Going second, Mihawk can often: develop a 6-cost plus 5-cost board · keep those bodies standing · force Rocks to choose between interacting and developing · play Shanks · Luna the board · put Rocks at zero before it can stabilize.

Sam · Key Cards

Perona is excellent because it can: freeze multiple meaningful bodies · reduce Rocks' ability to attack · protect the Mihawk player's hand and board · punish narrow development turns. ⚠️ Perona non è mai nominata nel segmento Rocks del video: le carte che Sam cita sono il board 6+5 in piedi, Rad Beam (vs Shiki), Shanks+Luna, Decken (su Shiki) e Stun Bonney sul loro 10.

Shanks plus Luna is especially strong because many Rocks bodies are Luna victims: Rocks has multiple 7-cost-or-less characters · its engines are often board-dependent · if Mihawk freezes them, Rocks loses its ability to turn hand cards into defense · Mihawk can then push large attacks while Rocks' board is disabled.

Rad Beam matters because Rocks often attempts to contest a body with Shiki. If Rocks uses Shiki to interact with a key Mihawk body: Rad Beam can save the body · Mihawk untaps with more board · Rocks has spent a turn trying to answer one unit · Mihawk double-develops and pulls further ahead.

Sam · What to Respect / Kyo

Sam highlights Captain John plus Usopp spell as the main thing Mihawk should be aware of. Rocks can put Mihawk at zero; Captain John plus Usopp spell can create a sudden unblockable-style finish; if Mihawk becomes careless at zero, it may lose to a line it assumed was not available. However, she views this as rare and manageable. Mihawk can usually avoid dying by maintaining leader power, counter, Luna access, and appropriate board control.

Kyo does not change the matchup much. Kyo can protect Rocks from some effect removal, but Sam does not believe it fundamentally changes Mihawk's plan: Mihawk does not need Vander Decken to win the matchup · Luna can still disable the board · Rad Beam can save Mihawk bodies · Mihawk can attack face · if Kyo matters, a 6k attack into it is acceptable because Rocks' natural counter is heavily weighted toward 2ks. Decken is nice when it is available, but not mandatory.

Sam · dal video
  • 01:28:48 Captain John / Usopp spell: "basically the only thing that can lead them to winning"; you are a 6k leader vs them and on some turns they only swing 5 because they must develop on curve. Two ways it resolves: you bleed every card out of their hand (uncommon), or they take the Usopp turn, discard six or seven cards, you Luna their board and still don't die.
  • 01:30:22 If they present something relevant like Shiki to Decken mid-game, "I like taking that spot", unless you have a lot of Lunas.
  • 01:31:15 "Probably the matchup where the Bepo is worst compared to the Shanks" (Luna-ing their board is so good); Stun Bonney off their 10-cost turn is "probably pretty good".
  • 01:32:51 Micro: attack at breakpoints that demand multiple cards through Newgate/Shiki — "eights are good, or really specifically not sevens", when DON allows.
  • 01:33:40 Kyo: send a six at it — Rocks' natural counter is almost all 2ks, so you put a 2k in their hand to make your Decken live later; eventually you Shanks and send a six into Kyo, and at that point you also have Luna. They should play John and Kyo in the same turn anyway, so you never get to Decken the John.
Confronto liste: qui non c'è una scelta da fare — entrambe le scuole sono ottimiste sul matchup. Sam ci arriva dalla forza naturale del board (6+5 che restano in piedi, Rad Beam su Shiki), con Law/Bepo come metodo alternativo per invalidare il loro board; Impact dall'uso pesante di Luna, mettendo in conto lo stallo di Captain John + evento Usopp, gli attack size giusti e il rispetto per Shiki.
Impact · dal video (1 set 2026)
  • 00:57:49 Newgate vale doppio: «Newgate kind of deals double damage to you: it allows the leader to swing eight without any DON!! commitment. Killing a Newgate isn't just saving you 3k counter — it's saving you 6k counter while also getting rid of one of their 3k counters.»
  • 00:57:02 Il matchup dipende dalla combo: «All its primary attackers are seven-cost, so it is very very weak to Luna. If the Luna-Shanks combo didn't exist, I don't think the matchup would be as lopsided as it is» — e «Don Marlin is a completely dead card now because of Mihawk» (00:56:05).
Kaido

Vs Kaido (Purple)

Vai primoFavorevole se non trovano King
King 9cKing 6c
Impact · Slide 31 — VS Kaido - Go 1st
  • Prior to the Fishman build, Purple ramp decks like Kaido (last set it was Katakuri) were favored as Law and Bepo wasn't really good enough at stalling out Kaido's bombs and a Big Mom swing turn was enough to put you far behind.
  • Now with Shanks + Vander Decken combo, your opponents are investing a lot into getting to higher DON totals while you're pressuring and you're able to remove their investment while generating tempo. It is similar to Red Roc while you already have a board, except the board is a 12K rush + everything else!
  • Vs Kaido - it is important to understand how to attack to play around their leader skill. Make sure your 6000 power characters attack for 7000. It is a better investment to put the DON on the characters than the leader when trying to get cards. When trying to push for lethal, it is a better investment to put the DON on the leader since the leader doesn't come with a theoretical -2000 power.
  • Getting Kaido to 0 isn't that easy as they have multiple heals. Luckily the deck is very bricky and if you're able to pressure multiple 7000 power swings throughout the game they will fall to low life totals and be forced to heal.
  • Yasopp is very important vs Kaido. It allows you to push with a character without being afraid of them attacking back into it. Later in the game, you also use it to restand Shanks after attacking with him to play around 10-Mom.
  • Take their first so you can develop an extra attacker and slow down their ramp. Ramp decks typically want to go first as they want more turns to use their extra DON.
  • Once you get the Kaido low in life - it is easy to close out the game with a Shanks Vander Decken combo removing a body and setting up lethal. Once they are low in hand, it is easy to use Shanks + all the free DON between the leader and Shanks to attack big into their rested bombs as well. Just make sure to fish out the leader skill with your 6000 power attacks from other units first.
Sam · Matchup Identity (note)

Sam sees Kaido as a reasonable but more difficult matchup than Rocks or yellow Big Mom decks. Kaido is dangerous because: it can interact with Mihawk's board · it can play large bodies · it can remove or punish exposed characters · it can make the standard Shanks plus Vander Decken plan less effective. Decken has made the matchup worse than it was previously. The biggest issue is that Kaido can punish the standard Mihawk bomb sequence and force Mihawk to work harder for board retention.

⚠️ Qui le note distorcono il video. (1) 00:17:37 "the biggest reason why I would not play Kaido is that the Decken makes the matchup so much worse than it was before" — Decken ha peggiorato il matchup per Kaido, non per Mihawk. (2) 01:37:39 "Kaido is the only matchup I can think of where you want to pick first" — vuoi più corpi in campo prima della loro prima bomba (le note non lo dicono). (3) Il tono: "not a ton of interesting stuff to do", "it's pretty chill", "if they miss the King you always win"; Sam non discute mai quale bomba giocare per prima. (4) «Enough defense to avoid early 8k attacks» viene dalla risposta su RG Luffy Ace (01:54:02), non da Kaido. (5) «Perona or other stuns to stop King»: nel video è specificamente Oden su 7 e 9, "none of the other fives you can play, especially with a Mihawk, actually do anything" (01:42:27).
Sam · Why Oden Matters
Oden→King

Oden is one of Mihawk's best cards against Kaido because it can stop King from attacking. If Kaido misses King, Sam believes Mihawk is generally heavily favored: Kaido lacks enough attack instances · Mihawk can develop more efficiently · Mihawk can freeze the board · Kaido struggles to both attack life and contest Mihawk's board. The Kaido player's most threatening games are the ones that establish King early, then use larger attacks to pressure Mihawk before its bomb turn.

Sam · Decken Consideration

Vander Decken is good against Kaido, but Mihawk's plan is not fully dependent on it. If Mihawk cannot Decken the relevant Kaido body: it can Rad Beam to protect board · it can freeze King · it can pressure face · it can eventually Shanks/Decken a relevant body · it can use Law/Bepo as a second bomb. The matchup is not free, but Sam still sees Mihawk as having enough strong lines.

Sam · dal video — il piano vero
  • 01:37:39 Pick first. You can Stun Bonney them off King, but only if they did not play a second ramp (their game very often includes Queen); "when you take them off the King turn you immediately win".
  • 01:38:26 You will "basically never" interact with their first bomb (only if they blocked with Kaido, then you Decken it). Flow going first: five on 5, six + five on 7, something turns at them; after their bomb they contest that body with the leader and you Rad Beam it; even the removal Kaido leaves you untapping with two bodies, then you play two more.
  • 01:39:15 Kaido "has no unfair counter tricks" (leader 2k when they can afford DON −1, and Beam Sword). The early game puts them to one or a "fake zero" (they heal to one with Lead Performers or Big Mom). At their second bomb you Shanks — "essentially no way for them to cover the 12" — and Decken one of their bombs and attach DON elsewhere: a damage, a counter demand and a bomb cleared in one turn. Their next Mom clears your Shanks; you play another Shanks or Law; they end up forced to send lethal from a low-counter position while you are at high life because their attacks went into your board.
  • 01:41:39 Without Decken it's harder but you usually have it by then. "Lunas are very uniquely bad in this matchup — you are generally trying to pitch it away"; maybe Luna just the King if needed to not die.
  • 01:42:27 Oden on 7 and 9 to stun King is one of your biggest priorities. If they miss King "you also always win"; then Stun Bonney into their 10 leaves them only Lead Performers, "a vanilla that heals someone".
Confronto liste: su Kaido le due scuole convergono su Shanks + Vander Decken come scambio di tempo che ha ribaltato il matchup (ed è uno dei motivi per cui Kaido è meno attraente contro Mihawk). La sfumatura: Sam ragiona sull'accesso consistente alla risposta — trovare Decken e Oden quando servono; Impact sull'esecuzione on-board — attacca a 7k coi 6k per giocare attorno alla riduzione del leader, DON!! sul leader solo quando prepari il letale, Yasopp che rialza Shanks per attaccare in sicurezza attorno alla 10 Mom.
Impact · dal video (1 set 2026)
  • 01:07:57 Il menu del fishing: swing 6k se ti va bene sia il leader effect sia l'hit («that is max value for them»), 7k se vuoi leader effect E carta — poi la forchetta: «Once you fish out the leader skill, you can go Shanks, tap down your big guy, put all the DON!! on the Shanks, jam it: 17k on their guy — most of the time the big guy dies or they give you all their cards.» (01:05:40)
  • 01:10:20 I 7-costi Kaido ti fanno un favore: «The seven-cost Kaidos are trying to deal with an early development. Luckily for you, seven-cost Kaido lets you use your Luna in the Kaido game.»
Nico RobinCharlotte Linlin

Vs Robin e Big Mom gialli (Linlin, Pudding)

Vai primo (Impact)Favorevole
10 Linlin
Impact · Slide 32 — VS Robin - Go 1st
  • Robin tries to starve you and board control your characters with 3 Sweet Generals. They try to attack you and get you to counter. Best way to counteract this is take the first couple of leader swings while focusing your energy on drawing a lot of cards with Samurai so you can easily get around their leader skill starving you.
  • Use Yasopp to remove their 4000 power bodies so that they don't have a huge board once they ramp to 10 DON and play Charlotte Linlin.
  • Shanks + Vander Decken and Luna the 4K Bodies is the win condition.
  • Yasopp is very key as it is an attacker they can't easily remove with 3 Sweet Generals.
  • Pressuring Robin is very key. You can't let them comfortably play 2 Big Moms as it'll create a lot of trouble for you if you can't remove the "buff their team" effect.
  • They don't really play KO triggers outside of maybe 1-2 Teach so pressuring them with your bodies is good, and go as wide as possible to make sure you have an efficient clock as well.
  • Once you comfortably are in B2B Shanks turns, the opponent will lose. The matchup is not good for Robin with Yasopp controlling them in the early game and Shanks removing all their attackers while setting up counter pressure. Just do what you can to make sure their Moms aren't getting enough advantage before then that you're left in a gamestate that isn't recoverable.
  • Don't really need to "play around" Gum Gum Giant. Just attack 7s and force it out when possible. Most of the time be prepared for Robin to live a turn longer than you think she will. She is very tanky with Borsa + Giant turns. Make sure that they don't have established attackers going into their defensive turns and all those turns will do is extend the game that you will inevitably win. If they have attackers and begin to stall is when it becomes a big problem for you.
Sam · Matchup Identity / Main Plan

Sam believes Mihawk is favored into yellow Big Mom decks, including Robin-style shells. The reason is that Mihawk devalues the ways yellow decks want to convert board. Yellow decks want to: build wide boards · play Big Mom · heal · use trigger bodies · attack with several mid-sized characters · force the opponent to spend cards defending life. Mihawk answers this with: Perona freezes · Oden freezes · Shanks plus Vander Decken · Luna · Law/Bepo · high leader power · repeated double development.

Mihawk should: take early damage when safe · develop bodies · freeze relevant 4k and 5k attackers · prevent Big Mom board turns from converting · push the opponent low before they establish repeated healing · use Shanks to remove the major body · use Luna to freeze triggers and smaller attackers · force the yellow player to attempt lethal from a low-counter position.

Sam · Stun Bonney Role

Stun Bonney is particularly useful into yellow Big Mom decks. If Mihawk stuns the opponent on their first major Big Mom turn: they may have no productive 10-DON!! play · their whole curve can become delayed · Mihawk gets another turn to develop · the opponent's board is still too narrow to pressure effectively · Mihawk can often take damage safely and then execute a bomb turn. The main exception is Pudding, which may have alternative plays and more flexible development.

Sam · Robin-Specific Notes
  • Counter banish hits more often than against many other decks because Robin's available DON!! is constrained.
  • The banish attacks are frequently small enough that countering is efficient.
  • Taking the first damage is often fine.
  • If Stun Bonney is available, Mihawk can take damage more liberally because Robin cannot execute the first 10-DON!! turn.
  • Make Linlin discard unless the random discard can hit a card that fundamentally ruins your game plan.
  • If the opponent is low on hand, force the heal because discarding the extra card becomes a real cost.
  • Never allow a heal if you are currently presenting lethal.

Why Mihawk wins: Mihawk can repeatedly freeze yellow's small attackers · survive while preserving board · prevent the Big Mom board from converting · put yellow low enough that a Shanks 12k swing becomes impossible to defend · force yellow to spend too many attacks into Mihawk's board, leaving Mihawk healthy enough to survive a final push.

Sam · dal video
  • 01:44:04 "Robin is the best yellow slop deck"; what she says about Robin applies to Linlin too. Linee concrete: if their board is wide enough to bomb you, Perona some 4ks so the Mom turn does little, then clear the Mom next turn with Shanks+Decken; or send your board, Shanks, Luna all the triggers, and only the 12k body is left.
  • 01:44:54 Law/Bepo is fine but "generally worse than the Luna stuff" here (their bodies are still 8ks); still counterable given few swings.
  • 01:45:41 Robin triple ramp: going first they can double pitch to leader + a ramp card and hit 10 "on your eight", so a Bonney would have to come on your six, taking you off the Mihawk turn. But that costs them two discards and a ramper (one fewer 4k on table), so their board is narrow, Perona is a fine answer; you double develop, Perona again, then your bomb cleans up "essentially their entire board". 01:48:02 Bonney on your six is still fine because most of these decks have nothing else to do on 10 but Mom; exception Pudding.
  • 01:49:01 The Linlin deck "will essentially never do anything threatening": both players discard a card each turn when they choose; you attack a lot and Perona / Bonney / Luna them.
  • 01:49:49 Disciplina: don't commit Shanks (or Perona) before sending your attacks, because triggers can play bodies over your Luna/Perona and you then can't attack under them.
  • 01:50:36 Vs Robin counter the banish hits; vs the other yellow decks take at least the first damage; with Bonney in hand take much more; otherwise counter to stay at 4 or 3.
  • 01:56:38 La lista gialla di Jelly Beans (9c Bonney, Robin burn): should be fine, you still beat them by Bonney-ing the Mom turn or freezing enough board; "you can still counter the seven that comes afterwards with a Rad Beam".
Confronto liste: il piano dettagliato di board control qui è quello di Impact/LawSopp — Yasopp toglie i 4k, pressione presto perché Robin non si prenda due turni Big Mom comodi, Shanks + Decken/Luna sui corpi chiave. Dal lato HawkRona il contributo specifico è la Stun Bonney, che spegne il primo turno Big Mom (vs Robin col triple ramp può voler dire giocarla sul tuo 6) e migliora incidentalmente tutti i turni board dei gialli.
Impact · dal video (1 set 2026)
  • 00:10:02 Lo start da rispettare, con la risposta al turno esatto: «They go second and they go Yamato plus ramp into Teach into Big Mom — those are the strong starts you need to be aware of. That's where Yasopp is pretty important: you need to be able to go, on your seven DON!! turn, respond with Yasopp + Vander Decken» sul Teach di turno 3.
  • 01:11:51 ⚠️ Aggiornamento rispetto alla slide 32 («maybe 1-2 Teach»): «Now it's more likely that they play four Teach since I wrote the guide. If they have the Teach trigger, that could be a win condition for them.»
  • 01:11:51 L'obiettivo del turno Linlin: «Ideally they only have one or even zero attackers when they play the Linlin. If you can Yasopp and Oden, clear as much as you can, and then Oden the turn that they play the Linlin — that is very very good for you.»
  • 01:12:38 Vai largo, ritarda Shanks: «It is more important for you to go like 65-65-65 than it is to go like 65-65-Shanks a lot of the time.»
Enel

Vs Enel (Purple)

Vai primoSolo Impact
Impact · Slide 33 — VS Enel - Go 1st
  • Establish searchers to remove their 1 cost units without having to invest much in doing so.
  • Use your leader to try and pressure a life every turn ideally. Don't really expect your board to stick / not be frozen. If something sticks, use it to swing 7000.
  • Oden is great at stalling out big Enels, Save them to try and do so. Yasopp is great at removing their 4 cost units to prevent them from snowballing into you with stuff sticking into another 4c + removal turn.
  • Shanks is great at removing their board or dealing damage. If you can get an Enel to 1 life, back to back Shanks is an easy win. If they are still at high enough life, then using Shanks to deal with a Reiju and using your weenies to clear their 1 costs is a strong turn as well.
  • Make sure to avoid taking too much damage from Enel. Try to counter at least 1 of their swings per turn so that you don't lose more than 1 life a turn. You'll need a life buffer to resolve back to back Shanks as Enel is one of the decks that can pressure you efficiently.
  • Shanks + Luna and then putting the Shanks into the Reiju while pushing 7 with lead is a big swing turn. Try to save the pieces, as it is a 4 card combo, but it'll be expensive and hard to pull off the combo multiple times so try to make sure the turn you do the combo that the Shanks is actually setting up a win on the following turn. Assume your Shanks dies and then you're sending lethal with your leader and another Shanks.
  • Getting Enel to 0 is basically game over as Shanks send 5 17 is basically always game since they have no +3-4k Event counters.
Sam non tratta Enel nel video. Il documento comparativo LawSopp vs HawkRona attribuisce comunque al lato HawkRona un piano essenziale — preserva le vite giuste, prepara i turni Shanks, usa i freeze per limitare la conversione del loro board — ma va preso come estrapolazione coerente, non come fonte diretta: il piano operativo resta quello di Impact qui sopra (pulisci gli 1 costi coi corpi economici, spingi una vita a turno col leader, Oden riservato agli Enel grossi, non perdere più di una vita a turno). Per il punto di vista opposto (Enel vs Mihawk, OP16.5) vedi la guida Enel Wasinha.
Impact · dal video (1 set 2026)
  • 01:18:13 Giocare attorno alla hand-rip Law: «Try and play around hand-rip Law if you can. Vander Decken is like a dead card in the matchup, so just pitch it for counter — which means you don't need to hold on to Kawamatsu as well. Pitch them for counter.» L'obiettivo: «not let them infinity hand-rip you a bunch of times back-to-back turns, because your pieces are more critical than their pieces.» (01:18:59)
  • 01:17:28 L'eccezione al lock totale: «You can literally leave them with no attacks going into you the next turn — unless they have a Shura.» E prima di Shanks serviva Dead Man's Game: «Before you had to kill them with Dead Man's Game, but now you just have Shanks.»
Portgas D. Ace

Vs Ace Luffy (RG)

Vai secondoSolo Sam
Sam · Matchup Identity / Play Pattern (note)

Sam views Ace Luffy as generally favorable for Mihawk. Ace Luffy often has limited counter and relies on its board to pressure. Mihawk can: freeze the board · attack life with large numbers · counter more aggressively after the first life · use Shanks and Luna to invalidate early bodies · outdevelop Ace Luffy over time.

Mihawk should: take the first life when safe · counter the second life more often to avoid random double-strike lethal · use Oden to freeze a relevant attacker · attack Ace Luffy rather than overfocus on board · use Shanks and Luna against the wide early board · push life because Ace Luffy often cannot defend repeated 7k attacks. Going second is favored because Mihawk's development is ahead and the bomb turn arrives earlier. Going first may require more aggressive countering on the 4-DON!! and 5-DON!! turns because those are some of the cheapest attacks Ace Luffy will make.

⚠️ Le note sono più sicure di Sam. Nel video (01:52:26): "I don't have a great answer" — freeze their guy with Oden, attack, counter aggressively (not the first life, often the second, to avoid the double-strike turn). Shanks is good because their early board is Luna-able; you're ahead in the race from developing more. Favoured going second; going first "maybe problematic": you might have to counter their 5k on 4 DON and the 5k next turn (cheapest swings) because your bomb comes a turn later; expect 8k swings early, Rad Beam helps. Il fatto certo che dà (00:36:24) è che il deck "has no 2ks, so they will die because [Mihawk] is 7k"; Perona è "insanely good" lì, Yasopp "terrible" (corpi tutti +3).

Vs Black (Elbaph) Luffy

Solo Sam · dal video
Sam · dal video

01:57:31 Same plan as Sabo but their attacks are smaller; always go face (no incentive to starve — their leader stays the same size); still attack a sideways body if offered; Shanks on their full board is fine. 01:59:05 Vs Elbaph Luffy (which doesn't buff its full board) you just race.

samsansOP · 29 ago 2026 · 2h00m  ·  Impact · 1 set 2026 · 2h08m

I video e cosa manca nelle note

I due video integrali: il deep dive di Sam (capitoli, 33 domande del Q&A, confronto note ↔ video) e la video-lezione di Impact «Hawk Guide Law/Yasopp Version» (capitoli, confronto appunti ↔ video). Timestamp cliccabili ovunque.

Sam — op17 mihawk deep dive

Apri su YouTube · trascrizione automatica completa in trascrizioni/samsans-video-trascrizione.md.

Capitoli

00:00:02Intro / housekeeping: Sam is in Orlando for the regional, may step out to let people into the hotel; the Kaido session is pushed to next week 00:00:49Positioning: Mihawk is "the most likely thing any of us play", not tier 0; Kaido is a reasonable tournament deck 00:01:38Screen share; "a lot of internal disagreement" in her group; decklist walkthrough starts 00:02:24Vander Decken is now standard (contest Sabo's board; good in the mirror "by accident") 00:03:16Wano core unchanged from 16.5; Law/Bepo still in the list 00:04:03Why stuns matter now (Shanks rests the board, Luna freezes it) 00:04:51Stun Bonney: the going-first mirror answer on the 9-DON turn; Law+Bonney vs bare Bonney 00:06:25Bonney vs yellow Big Mom / Robin; Bonney gives nothing vs Sabo; "mirror is by far the most important thing" 00:08:006c Mihawk vs 5c Law: Yasopp is the reason people play Law; why Mihawk is better (standing body, filter) 00:11:13The more common Law+Yasopp build (Josh's preference) and its problems (Law/Samurai anti-synergy) 00:13:36Perona vs Yasopp into Sabo (Gravity Blade, 2-drop + Saul + Docking hands) 00:15:11Hypothetical no-Decken build: Stun Bonney + Law/Bepo, no Shanks package 00:16:48Q: isn't Shanks/Decken better into yellow slop and Kaido? 00:18:24Why she still plays Law/Bepo: it consolidates Shanks+Decken+Luna into one card as second bomb; Bepo vs Sabo 00:21:34Q: why fewer Boats; Rad Beam vs 2k in the mirror; earlier version 2 Rad / 10 2k / 1 Boat 00:23:12Q: Robin ramps on turn 2 — Stun Bonney? (break to let "Kamera" into the hotel, answer at 00:24:12) 00:24:12The other 3k events: Stronger, For Fun, DMG — why not 00:26:35Why so many Rad Beams: it is the only event that defends the board 00:28:33Q: do you attack in every matchup? (yes, incl. Sabo with caveats) 00:29:23Bomb count: "I don't think you need five", you need to draw two; list not in Codex yet 00:30:26Q: Hody? (no — brick) 00:31:12Bonney vs Rocks not the reason it's there; why no 7c or 9c Shanks 00:32:50Q: is Mihawk+Perona purely for the mirror? 00:34:50Q: what are Elijah / Josh playing; "47 of these cards are the same" 00:35:37Q: blocker / Perona / Yasopp vs RG Luffy Ace; a Fishman session will come later 00:38:13Q: 2/2 Law-Mihawk split? Zoro 2k? 00:40:13Q: cut two events for Zoro? shape of the no-Decken list; four Samurai "for sure" 00:41:56Transition to matchups 00:42:46Mirror: early game, going second, double-six games 00:44:22Mirror: the 12k swing and life management (at least 2 life before their 10-DON turn) 00:45:59Mirror going first (a): Stun Bonney line, what the opponent can do on 9 DON, how many attacks come at you 00:49:11Mirror going first (b): use the extra DON to push damage; skip the six on 9 00:52:26Mirror: Samurai'd bodies + Luna tempo; Law/Bepo as the second bomb after Shanks-Decken-Luna 00:54:48Mirror going second (straightforward); counter-Bonney; Rad Beam DON planning 00:58:07Q: when do you not play Boat? Q: go second? Q: Decken the 7c Shanks? 01:01:25Q (voice): the odd curve — slow development to push damage? Otama on 7/9? 01:04:36Q (voice): always slam the 10 drop on 10? 01:06:23Sabo: why her approach differs (no Yasopp); attack vs starve 01:10:21Sabo: racing, blockers, Gravity Blade, counter breakpoints, Luffy on 9 01:13:32Sabo: which bodies to contest, Perona, Law/Bepo, going first vs second (~60% second) 01:16:40Q: how do you decide starve vs attack? 01:20:41Q: what if you miss pieces (Law/Bepo without Shanks, Shanks without Decken)? 01:23:59Q: does Sabo ever keep its guys standing? Q: which body should Oden freeze? 01:26:24Rocks: structural advantage, Gloriosa, Shiki + Rad Beam, Captain John / Usopp spell 01:32:51Rocks micro: attack at breakpoints (8s, not 7s) 01:33:40Q: what if Rocks plays Kyo? (Captain John + Kyo in one turn) 01:36:04Kaido: the only matchup where she picks first; Bonney off King; game flow; Luna is bad here; Oden on 7 and 9 01:43:15Yellow "slop" decks framed through Robin: Perona the 4ks, Luna the triggers, Bepo worse here 01:45:41Robin specifics: triple ramp going first → 10 on your 8; Bonney on six; Pudding exception 01:49:01Linlin deck; discipline (attack before playing Shanks/Perona vs triggers); banish hits; Linlin discard vs heal 01:52:26Q: RG Luffy Ace 01:54:57Q: how good is this list overall? ("very good vs everything except Sabo") 01:56:38Q: Jelly Beans' yellow list (9c Bonney, Robin burn) 01:57:31Black (Elbaf) Luffy plan 01:58:19Law/Bepo recap; Q: six-on-six vs Sabo; sign-off (01:59:53)

Dove le note non coincidono col video

Sintesi · verificato sulla trascrizione

Le note ordinate sono fedeli nella grande maggioranza dei punti. Questi sono i casi in cui dicono qualcosa di diverso (o in più) rispetto al video; nelle pagine della guida sono già segnalati con ⚠️ al posto giusto.

TemaLe note diconoSam dice nel video
Coffin BoatShanks e le carte care usano più DON!!, quindi ci sono meno turni con DON!! liberi per convertire un evento.00:21:34 Senza 7c/9c Shanks è "very easy to have DON open to convert the Rad Beams": più DON!! liberi, quindi lo stage serve meno; e ci sono molti meno eventi.
Decken vs Kaido«Decken has made the matchup worse than it was previously» (tra i motivi per cui Kaido è pericoloso).00:17:37 Decken ha peggiorato il matchup per Kaido: "the biggest reason why I would not play Kaido".
Kaido: primo o secondoNon lo dice.01:37:39 "The only matchup I can think of where you want to pick first."
Kaido: tono«Reasonable but more difficult»; «a plan for whether Shanks or Law/Bepo is the better first bomb»."Pretty chill", "if they miss the King you always win"; non discute mai quale bomba prima; il 12 di Shanks alla loro seconda bomba è incopribile.
Cosa ferma King«Perona or other stuns».01:42:27 Specificamente Oden su 7 e 9.
Luna vs KaidoNon lo dice.01:41:39 "Very uniquely bad", da scartare.
«Early 8k attacks» (Kaido)Tra le priorità vs Kaido.01:54:02 È nella risposta su RG Luffy Ace.
Numero di bombe«She does not believe four copies are necessary.»00:29:23 "I just don't think that you need five" — mai "four".
Brook (Sabo)«Saul, Loki, Luffy, and Brook».Brook non è mai nominato.
Perona vs RocksBlocco «Perona is excellent».Perona non è nominata nel segmento Rocks (board 6+5, Rad Beam, Shanks+Luna, Decken, Bonney).
Ace Luffy«Generally favorable… cannot defend repeated 7k attacks».01:52:26 "I don't have a great answer"; favorito secondo, primo "maybe problematic".
Search Priority / Know Which Attack MattersDue sezioni con liste per matchup.Non dette nel video: sintesi di chi ha scritto le note.
«65-body»«Develop a 65-body on 6… another 65-body on 8».00:43:34 "A six drop on six and then a six drop on eight."
Perona quando viene attaccata (Sabo)«Protects against removal by replacing itself.»01:07:10 "Float into something if it dies, so you can just let it die and summon an Oden."
Bonney vs RobinBonney sul primo turno Big Mom, in generale.01:46:29 Vs Robin che fa triple ramp vuol dire Bonney sul tuo 6, perdendo il turno Mihawk: accettabile, non ideale.
Potenza del leaderNon la dà.Sam dice "7k leader" (vs giallo) e "6k leader" (vs Rocks); la carta è 5000, +1000 vs leader <Slash>, +1000 per DON!!.
Nel video ma non nelle note — i punti più grossi
  • La build senza Decken (Stun Bonney + Law/Bepo, più 6 costi e più eventi) — 00:15:11, 00:41:00.
  • Perché niente 7c/9c Shanks — 00:31:12.
  • La matematica del turno Bonney a 9 DON!! e il "dead to 10k+12k / 11k+12k" — 00:48:21.
  • Decken sul 7c Shanks avversario — 00:58:59.
  • Il leader di Sabo guadagna 1k a 3 vite — 01:08:46; six-on-six vs Sabo — 01:59:05.
  • Rocks: attacca a 8, non a 7 — 01:32:51.
  • Robin: triple ramp → 10 sul tuo 8 — 01:45:41.
  • Black (Elbaph) Luffy e la lista gialla di Jelly Beans — 01:57:31, 01:56:38.

Tutto il dettaglio (75 punti) è in trascrizioni/samsans-video-vs-note.md.

Q&A del video (33 domande)

QuandoDomandaRisposta (sintesi)
00:16:48Isn't Shanks/Decken better into yellow slop and Kaido than Bonney/Bepo?Better into Kaido for sure; not meaningfully into yellow (Bonney their 10 turn, Bepo next turn, 7k leader). Without Decken you lose to Kaido, but Kaido should shrink if everyone plays Decken (item 11).
00:21:34Why not as many Boats?Without 7c/9c Shanks you easily have DON open to convert Rad Beam, and there are far fewer events; Boat's remaining merit is the cantrip; could be convinced to play a third.
00:23:12Robin played a ramp card on turn 2 going first, threatening 10 on turn 4 — Bonney?(Clarifies they'd need to double pitch.) Would probably not Bonney unless their board is wide enough to matter; if it is, Bonney is fine.
00:24:12The other 3k events?Stronger stuns too few; For Fun can't be forced and gets played around; DMG lethals don't happen and RG is unplayable; none defend the board.
00:28:33Do you attack in every matchup?Yes, including Sabo, with caveats covered in the Sabo section.
00:29:23Law/Bepo count?Don't need five; deck is tight; you need to draw two bombs, sometimes one; Law is the more consistent second bomb.
00:29:23Is the list in Codex?Not yet; after the session.
00:30:26Hody?Not terrible, but an unnecessary brick.
00:31:12Bonney turning off Rocks?Good but not why it's there.
00:31:127c / 9c Shanks?No: Decken trades too well; 9 = Decken; 7 shouldn't be turned sideways and anti-synergises with stuns/Luna.
00:32:50Mihawk+Perona just for the mirror?Mainly, but Mihawk is also just the better card (standing, bigger body).
00:34:50What are Elijah / Josh on?Doesn't know Elijah's; Josh prefers Laws; 47 cards shared; Bonney/Bepo slots vary.
00:35:37Blocker must be good (vs RG Luffy Ace)?Perona is far better; Ace has no 2ks; Yasopp is terrible there (+3 bodies); green Luffy rests blockers.
00:38:132 Law / 2 Mihawk?No — everything except Bonney is worse with Law.
00:39:00Zoro 2k?Good in the mirror but current 2ks matter more.
00:40:13Cut two events for Zoro?No — multiple Rad Beams per game matter.
00:40:13What changes if you cut Decken?More sixes (Laws + Mihawks), more Laws, more events; sample list later.
00:41:00Fewer than four Samurai?No, four for sure.
00:58:07When would you not play Boat?Only when the DON is needed (Luna turns); play it after refreshing.
00:58:07First or second in the mirror?Second, "for sure".
00:58:59Decken the 7c Shanks?Usually yes (kills a 9k); always going second; going first also fine unless you're Luna-ing anyway.
01:01:25Should the going-first player slow development to push damage?Only the six on 9 is skippable; otherwise hands aren't made enough to skip Samurai/searchers; won't Otama for nothing.
01:04:36Always slam the 10 drop on 10?Yes; delaying just delays the game; Bonney+five on 10 is theoretical.
01:16:40Decide starve vs attack before the game or from information?Default attack; exceptions: opponent mulligans and skips 2 while your hand is bad, or they counter too early at 4 life.
01:20:41What if you miss pieces (Bepo without Shanks, Shanks without Decken)?Bepo alone is fine; Shanks alone = race (Shanks-Luna, counter leader+Loki); early: Bonney off Loki, Perona the five.
01:23:59Does Sabo ever keep bodies standing?Attacking disincentivises it; with one Saul they often still should; Loki lets them turn Saul.
01:25:36Should Oden freeze the big body instead of the weenie?Freeze the weenie if you have Decken and accept the damage; freeze the big one only if you can't take the damage.
01:33:40What if Rocks plays Kyo?Basically nothing changes; six into Kyo to draw a 2k; Luna covers it; John+Kyo come the same turn anyway.
01:52:26Vs Ace?Oden their guy, attack, counter the second life; favoured second; going first counter the 5ks on 4 DON.
01:54:57Is this list good beyond the mirror?Very good vs everything but Sabo; the most mirror-built list within reason; Yasopp would add a couple of points vs Sabo.
01:56:38Tested Jelly Beans' list?Not specifically; same reasons apply; 9c Bonney is their alt bomb; Rad Beam the seven after the Robin burn.
01:57:31Plan vs black Luffy?Same as Sabo but smaller attacks; always go face.
01:59:05Vs Sabo, six-on-six or face?Six into the six (kill the body) because the leader becomes six after one more damage anyway; vs Elbaf Luffy just race.

Impact — Hawk Guide Law/Yasopp Version

Apri su YouTube · 1 set 2026 · 2h07m · trascrizione automatica in trascrizioni/impact-lezione-video-trascrizione.md · appunti in impact-lezione-video-note.md · confronto completo in impact-lezione-video-vs-note.md.

Cos'è. La video-lezione della guida PPTX già integrata in questo sito: «The first hour was I was going over the guide and talking and answering any questions. The second hour was I just went over gameplay». Prima ora = le slide commentate a voce (con numeri ed esempi in più), poi quattro mirror e una partita vs Robin nei VOD, e Q&A di chiusura. I dettagli davvero nuovi rispetto alla guida sono integrati nei vari tab nei blocchi tratteggiati blu «Impact · dal video».

Capitoli (lezione Impact)

Parte slide (00:00 – 01:20)

00:00:05Intro to the deck: midrange con rush finisher; aggressivo vs control, controllante vs aggro («you're trying to do both but you're not trying to do both at the same time») 00:01:37Sticky characters (Yasopp, Oden); il loop Perona+Law («you just try and like spam Perona») 00:02:22Posizionamento: «more towards the aggressive side of mid-range… not as aggressive as Ace, not as defensive as Rocks»; deck di fondamentali 00:03:53What the deck isn't: non control, non il vecchio Mihawk OP14; le freeze spingono tempo, non allungano la partita 00:05:25Board reload: le carte si rimpiazzano da sole (esempio Gravity Blade su Law+Yasopp) 00:06:11Strengths: consistenza, searcher, filtraggio verso le unsearchable (Vander Decken, Yasopp, Coffin Boat) 00:06:56Free DON!!: 4 extra a turno (leader+stage), 6 con Shanks; racing con Shanks e Luna 00:07:43Weaknesses: partenze esplosive (Blue-Green, Sabo, Black Luffy) — solo le partenze VERE 00:08:29Brick count: ~18 bricks (contro i 10-11 degli altri deck); micromanagement con Kin'emon/Samurai 00:09:17Weakness: bodies fuori Luna-range senza Decken; gli 8-cost sono gestibili (Yasopp + Decken, bounce con Law) 00:10:02Le partenze forti di Robin (Yamato+doppio ramp → Teach → Big Mom) e la risposta Yasopp+Decken sul turno a 7 DON!! 00:10:49«Deck is pretty overtuned… kind of broken»: previsione di ban (ottobre, limitazione a Shanks) 00:11:35Q&A searcher: Otama prima (meno bersagli), Perona dopo; Kin'emon turno 1 00:12:20Sequenza di draw/search: draw singoli prima (stage → Kin'emon → Samurai), poi ricerche (Otama → Perona) 00:13:54Parte 2 — la lista: flex slot (Law/Bepo, For Fun, 4° Shanks); perché lui gioca 4 Shanks 00:14:39Desiderata (più stage, 3ª Luna, 4ª Rad Beam); tech cards: Hody Jones, 6c Smoker+Perona build 00:15:25Smoker come risposta alla Bonney OP07; Dead Man's Game da torneo grande 00:16:12Law/Bepo tech: nel mirror invalidi le 6k diventando leader 8k, ora che tutti attaccano full board per girare intorno a Shanks 00:17:46Mulligan going first: searcher, «these 18 cards are the key pieces», Yasopp unsearchable 00:18:34Mulligan going second: più aperto a 5-drop e Law; «Perona casts the widest net» 00:19:22Key cards: Perona, Kin'emon, Law, Samurai; Shanks «this card's broken» 00:20:10L'efficienza di Shanks: 5+17 invece di full jam leader a 15; chiedi 14k di counter 00:20:56Law double develop; Yasopp restands; Q&A mulligan (mano Samurai+Law senza one-drops = no keep) 00:21:46Regola mulligan: «what you're looking for is a hand that does things» 00:22:33Curva going first turno per turno («perfect curve is one one samurai»); convertire i free DON!! in danni, i 7k presto 00:24:06Il turno a 5 DON!!: Law+Yasopp/Vander Decken per killare Shiki/Teach/Katakuri; è IL turno per ciclare i searcher 00:25:37Curva going second: doppio one-drop, corpo attivo per Law, killare il drop del loro turno a 5 DON!! (lead 2-0) 00:26:24Contare i turni alla fine partita; primo Shanks li porta a 1-0, il secondo uccide; «15 DON» → 16 con stage, 17 con Smoker 00:27:54Early/mid/late plan; timing delle Luna in base ai turni residui (2 turni → spam Luna; 3+ → primo Shanks per board control) 00:29:29Pitfalls: poca aggressione, non ciclare i brick, non bounciare Perona, sottovalutare il board control 00:30:15Board control fondamentale: l'esempio Law+Yasopp sul loro Yasopp → lead 4-1, 5 attacchi vs 2 00:31:02Far uscire gli event counter dalla mano (senza stage non tieni DON!! su nei turni finali) 00:32:36How to defend the life: prendere danni aggressivamente, stabilizzare a 2 vite con Rad Beam/Law-Bepo/Luna; nel mirror counterare i colpi 6-8 00:34:07Difendere i personaggi; lasciarli morire quando scali verso i turni Shanks 00:34:54Early game plan: non prendere pezzi ridondanti (3° 5-drop, 3° Law); prendere danni presto per pescare 00:35:39Mid game 5-9 DON!!: «you go 5 65 65», le 6k diventano 7k; budget di un turno extra («one more turn») 00:37:13Late game: Shanks combo; il singolo Law/Bepo («when I wrote the guide, I was playing a single Law/Bepo») 00:38:44Filtering: scartare non-counter prima dei counter; non tenere 3° Shanks/3° Law 00:39:29Differenza dai vecchi build: «we are a Luna based deck», niente più infinity DON!! in difesa 00:40:14Leader skill: 1 DON!! → 2 carte di danno = good trade; endgame «solitaire» Shanks-Luna a catena 00:42:34Come finisce la partita: Shanks 17k, lavorare a ritroso; damage mapping («in Pokemon they call it prize mapping») 00:44:11Don't ship risky lethals; Law+Bonney per congelare il loro DON!! e proteggere il blocker da Shanks 00:45:45Q&A: niente 5-drop sul 5? «I just play Yasopp and tap it to my leader skill»; attacker vs "turtle" (blocker); Bonney per skippare il loro 6; Oden vs Yasopp 00:48:18Turning around losing scenarios: back-to-back Shanks anche da dietro; estendere con Law+Oden/Bonney/Bepo 00:49:04Matchup — Mirror (go second): damage mapping, «if you're good at pre-release, this is like pre-release» 00:51:22Mirror: taglie d'attacco 7k/8k/9k/10k; il mirror gioca solo otto 2k counter 00:52:56Mirror: life buffer per i turni Shanks; ciclare Perona per trovare le Luna («Luna will often save you like four cards») 00:53:46Q&A: build Mihawk/Perona vs Law/Yasopp nel mirror («if it's better, it's only marginally better») e contro il resto del meta 00:56:05Matchup — Rocks (go second): «GG easy», leader Slash, Don Marlin carta morta 00:57:02Rocks: attaccanti 7-cost deboli a Luna; Captain John + Usopp event; Bepo stalla John; Newgate = doppio danno 00:58:36Rocks: giocare intorno a Shiki, Decken sugli Shiki scoperti, Yasopp sui Kyo; taglie d'attacco; paragone con i vecchi deck Kid 00:59:22Matchup — Sabo: i 2-for-5 che diventano 2-for-6, giants, Luffy rush; «Yasopp is a stupid card» 01:00:54Sabo: Oden su Loki (nega un 9k), For Fun per i Saul, Yasopp su Zoro così Decken prende i grossi; niente Otama sul tavolo 01:02:26Sabo: race vs starve; two-turn kill con doppio Shanks; Q&A (quando attaccano per 7, starve a 4 vite) 01:04:02Matchup — Kaido (go first): Shanks+Decken ha ribaltato il matchup («you're paying two to kill their 10») 01:05:40Kaido: fishing della leader skill con i 6k, poi Shanks 17k sul boss; heals = contare un turno extra 01:07:11Kaido: restand di Shanks contro la Big Mom 10; overload dei loro DON!!; due 10-cost in gioco = morti 01:09:30Dinamica anti-ramp: bomba → risposta immediata; i 7c Kaido ti lasciano usare Luna 01:11:05Matchup — Robin/giallo (go first): out-cardare lo starve; Yasopp sul 4k pre-Linlin; ora giocano 4 Teach 01:12:38Robin: 65-65-65 meglio di 65-65-Shanks; Stun Bonney sul loro turno a 10; Borsalino+Giant buono contro tutto tranne Shanks 01:14:26Robin: la linea completa di board control fino a essere five wide 01:15:11Matchup — Enel: matchare i loro one-drops, Oden sui grossi, Yasopp sui 4-cost anti-snowball 01:16:42Enel: Shanks+Luna svuota il board; secret win condition (2 Shanks con loro a 1 vita); hand-rip Law e Kawamatsu/Decken come counter 01:19:45Fine slide: «final thoughts. Deck broken. Need nerf. Play till end.»

Gameplay + Q&A finale (01:20 – 02:07)

01:20:33Premessa ai VOD: nasconde il nickname ranked (cambia account) per non farsi leggere la lista prima del «million-dollar tournament» (flame flame fruit) 01:23:01Mirror game 1: sequenza searcher/Samurai; a 01:25:22 la "pseudo Luna" (Bonney+Luna da five wide) 01:27:51Mirror game 2 (vs build Perona): sizing per fare danno; Law+Bonney per estendere; Stun Bonney che nega il 10-Shanks avversario 01:31:23La lista giocata: copiata da una top 4 cinese, 2 Bonney; «very important to try other people's decks» 01:34:05Mirror game 3: keep di mano media, board control, il turno del cash-out delle Rad Beam (01:40:20, spiegato a 01:43:05 e 01:45:35) 01:46:36Mirror game 4: l'avversario concede con mano Shanks-Shanks-Shanks-Luna-Luna dopo la Bonney sul DON!! 01:49:21Q: mai 3 Bonney? No — ne basta vederne una, la ricicli con Law 01:50:21Robin game (l'unica sconfitta della sessione) + differenze lista cinese vs lista della guida 01:53:34Analisi dell'errore vs Robin: doveva pushare danno e metterlo a 1 prima degli heal 01:54:33Q&A finale: quando è male tappare le 6k con Samurai; «when there is a tier zero deck, you play the tier zero deck» 01:56:57Meta talk: Kaido cala di play rate; la build Perona verrà «gapped» dalla Stun Bonney+Law 01:57:53Anti-aggro: board control presto; opzione Zoro 2k counter 02:00:12Vs Teach: searcher sul board per swingare 5-5 con la leader skill 02:01:49«If you're losing with Mihawk, it's more about yourself than it is the deck»; Stun Bonney come comeback tool going first 02:03:24Ipotesi: going first migliore con tante Bonney+Law; la build Perona going first «gets invalidated» 02:04:23Opzioni singola Kiku / singolo Zoro; col primo searcher di solito prende un altro searcher 02:05:09Off-topic (la storia del negozio, OP5/OP6, «premium binders are infinite money glitch») fino al taglio a 02:07:44

Dove gli appunti non coincidono col video (Impact)

Gli appunti della lezione sono fedeli sulla struttura ma contaminati: almeno 5 sezioni non esistono in questo video e alcune coincidono con capitoli della lezione di samsansOP già integrata qui. Sotto le 12 discrepanze trovate; il dettaglio con tutte le citazioni è in trascrizioni/impact-lezione-video-vs-note.md.
  1. ⚠️ «Impact recommends four Samurai» — mai detto nel video: l'unico «four» a voce è sui Shanks (00:13:54). Probabile eco del pptx o di samsans.
  2. ⚠️ «Oden per freezare King ai turni 7/9 DON!!» — assente: nella sezione Kaido (01:04:02) King è solo la partenza ramp da negare, Oden non è mai indicato su King. «Oden on 7 and 9» è un punto della lezione Kaido di samsansOP.
  3. ⚠️ L'eccezione «Pudding-style builds» su Stun Bonney vs i gialli — assente: "Pudding" compare una sola volta, parlando di carte vendute (02:05:57). Anche questo è materiale samsans.
  4. ⚠️ La sezione «Linlin choice» (discard vs heal) — assente dal video: è un capitolo della lezione di samsansOP, già nella guida col badge Sam.
  5. ⚠️ «Final Tournament Checklist» — la slide finale reale è «final thoughts. Deck broken. Need nerf. Play till end.» (01:19:45); la checklist è una sintesi del note-taker (riportata nel Gameplan con l'etichetta giusta).
  6. ⚠️ Mirror: «Why going second is strong» con 5 motivi — nel video è una riga («go second, ideally», 00:49:04) e a fine lezione Impact apre perfino all'ipotesi opposta con Bonney+Law (02:03:24).
  7. ⚠️ «Impact likes at least one Law/Bepo» come posizione attuale — nel video è datata: «When I wrote the guide, I was playing a single Law/Bepo» (00:37:13); la lista dei VOD lo ha tagliato (01:50:21).
  8. ⚠️ Sabo: «Decken kills Saul» — nel video i Saul sono compito di For Fun (01:00:54); Decken è per i grossi dopo che Yasopp toglie Zoro. Gli appunti non nominano mai For Fun.
  9. ⚠️ «Counter more of the smaller attacks» senza il caveat del video: il primo 6 sul leader di solito NON lo copri; copri 6k/7k con una carta dal 3°-4° life (00:52:08).
  10. ⚠️ Soglie 9k/10k invertite — nel video il 9k è per «no eight rested cards» e il 10k per superare Billion Fold («very rare», 00:51:22), non viceversa.
  11. ⚠️ «I turni 7 e 9 DON!! sono per il cycling» — nel video il turno di cycling esplicito è quello a 5 DON!! (00:24:06), col 7 come esempio secondario.
  12. ⚠️ Rocks: regola d'attacco compressa — persa la riga intermedia «attack them with your leader for seven if they have Shiki up» (00:58:36): con Shiki attivo il leader può swingare 7, sono i personaggi che vanno a 8/base.

Nota terminologica: negli appunti «Rad Beam (Billion Fold)»; nel video Impact la chiama quasi sempre «billion(s)» e nei VOD «Rad Beams» — stessa carta.

Dalla «Fast Decision Table» del confronto LawSopp vs HawkRona

Che mazzo sei?

Otto domande sul tuo meta e sul tuo modo di giocare. Alla fine il quiz ti dice se sei da HawkRona (Sam · 6c Mihawk + Perona) o da LawSopp (Impact · Law + Yasopp) — o cosa fare se resti in crisi. Ricorda: 47 carte su 51 sono le stesse, stai scegliendo uno slot da 5-6 costi e due tech.
Dracule Mihawk 6c — HawkRona VS Trafalgar Law 6c — LawSopp

Il quiz

1 Nel tuo meta locale cosa incontri di più?

2 Quale sconfitta ti brucia di più?

3 Il tuo turno a 5 DON!! ideale?

4 I 3 DON!! gratis del leader per te sono…

5 Nel mirror, sinceramente…

6 Andando primo nel mirror preferisci…

7 Turni tipo searcher → Samurai → Law → bounce Perona → replay → dig per Shanks:

8 Quale motto ti convince di più?

0 / 8 risposte
Da dove viene. Domande e verdetti sono la «Fast Decision Table» e i profili («best player profile», «best metagame profile», «main failure mode») del documento comparativo LawSopp vs HawkRona, riorganizzati in forma di quiz. Non è scienza: è un modo rapido di capire da che parte pendi.
Riferimento carte · immagini ufficiali Bandai (EN)

Carte e soprannomi

Tutte le carte citate dalle due guide, con effetto ufficiale e il nome con cui le chiamano Impact e Sam.

Dizionario dei soprannomi

Come la chiamanoCartaID
"Shanks", "10 Shanks", "5 cost 12000 rusher"ShanksOP17-022
"Law/Bepo", "Lobo", "Bepo"Law & BepoST24-004
"Law" (Impact), "Law 5c" (Sam: gioca il 5 costi dalla mano)Trafalgar Law 6cOP13-031
"6c Mihawk", "the six cost Mihawk"Dracule Mihawk 6cST32-003
"Perona" (Sam, il 5 costi che stunna)Perona 5cOP14-033
"Perona" (Impact, la searcher che "finds everything")Perona 1cOP12-034
"Stun Bonney", "OP07 Jewelry Bonney"Jewelry Bonney 5cOP07-026
"Oden"Kouzuki Oden 5cST32-002
"Decken", "Vander"Vander Decken IXOP06-033
"the extra Fishman" (pitch per Decken)KawamatsuOP12-023
"Samurai", "YCBMSamurai", "Samurai effects"You Can Be My Samurai!!OP01-055
"Rad Beam" (Sam), "Billions", "Billionfold" (Impact)The Billion-fold World TrichiliocosmOP06-038
"Luna"Electrical LunaOP08-036
"Stronger"I Know You're Strong… So I'll Go All Out from the Very Start!!!OP13-040
"DMG", "Dead Mans Game"Demon Aura Nine Sword Style Asura Blades Drawn Dead Man's GameOP12-037
"For Fun", "Fun their guy"For FunOP14-037
"Boat", "Stage", "Coffin Boat"Coffin BoatOP14-039
"Kinemon"Kin'emon 1cST32-001
"searchers", "ones", "one-drops"Otama · Perona 1c · Kin'emonOP07-022 · OP12-034 · ST32-001
"2ks", "2k counters"Le carte con counter 2000 (Otama, Kawamatsu…)—
"6k bodies", "a six", "a five", "6+5"I personaggi da 6 costi (Law/Mihawk) e da 5 (Oden, Yasopp, Perona, Kawamatsu, Bonney)—
"Usopp event", "Usopp spell" (Rocks)And That's When Somebody Makes Fun of Their Friend's Dream!!!!EB02-030
"Giants", "12-costs" (Sabo)Jaguar D. Saul · Loki (+12 costo)OP17-089 · OP17-119
Le note di Sam sono state trascritte da qualcun altro a partire dal video: i nomi delle carte nelle note ("Rad Beam", "Stronger") sono i soprannomi usati a voce, identificati qui tramite l'effetto descritto (Rad Beam = +2000/+4000 come Radical Beam!!; Stronger = «stuns two»).

Le carte del deck

Leader

Dracule Mihawk

Dracule Mihawk

OP14-020 · Leader · Costo 5 · 5000 pow · The Seven Warlords of the Sea
Leader
If your opponent's Leader has the <Slash> attribute, this Leader gains +1000 power.
[Activate: Main] [Once Per Turn] You may rest 1 of your cards: If there is a Character with a cost of 5 or more, set up to 3 of your DON!! cards as active. Then, you cannot play Character cards during this turn.

Searcher e filtro (1 costo)

Otama

Otama

OP07-022 · Character · Costo 1 · Counter 2000 · Land of Wano
Otama · searcher
[On Play] Look at 5 cards from the top of your deck; reveal up to 1 green {Land of Wano} type card other than [Otama] and add it to your hand. Then, place the rest at the bottom of your deck in any order.
Perona

Perona

OP12-034 · Character · Costo 1 · 2000 pow · Counter 1000 · Muggy Kingdom/Thriller Bark Pirates
Perona 1c · searcher
[On Play] If your Leader has the <Slash> attribute, look at 5 cards from the top of your deck; reveal up to 1 <Slash> attribute card or green Event and add it to your hand. Then, place the rest at the bottom of your deck in any order.
Kin'emon

Kin'emon

ST32-001 · Character · Costo 1 · 2000 pow · Counter 1000 · Land of Wano/The Akazaya Nine
Kin'emon · draw 2 trash 1
[On Play] You may rest your attribute Leader or 1 of your DON!! cards: Draw 2 cards and trash 1 card from your hand.

Removal

Vander Decken IX

Vander Decken IX

OP06-033 · Character · Costo 2 · 2000 pow · Counter 1000 · Fish-Man/Flying Pirates
Vander Decken IX · "Decken"
[On Play] You may trash 1 {Fish-Man} type card from your hand or 1 [The Ark Noah] from your hand or field: K.O. up to 1 of your opponent's rested Characters.

Corpi da 5-6 costi ("65-body")

Kawamatsu

Kawamatsu

OP12-023 · Character · Costo 5 · 6000 pow · Counter 2000 · Fish-Man/Land of Wano/The Akazaya Nine
Kawamatsu · Fish-Man 6k
-
Yasopp

Yasopp

OP17-031 · Character · Costo 5 · 6000 pow · Counter 1000 · Red-Haired Pirates
Yasopp
[On Play] Draw 1 card and rest up to 1 of your opponent's Characters with a cost of 8 or less.
[End of Your Turn] Set up to 1 of your Characters with a type including "Red-Haired Pirates" as active.
Kouzuki Oden

Kouzuki Oden

ST32-002 · Character · Costo 5 · 6000 pow · Counter 1000 · Land of Wano/Kouzuki Clan
Kouzuki Oden · "Oden"
[On Play] Draw 1 card and up to 1 of your opponent's Characters with a base cost of 6 or less cannot be rested until the end of your opponent's next End Phase.
Trafalgar Law

Trafalgar Law

OP13-031 · Character · Costo 6 · 6000 pow · FILM/Supernovas/Heart Pirates
Trafalgar Law 6c · "Law"
If you have 1 or less Life cards, this Character gains [Blocker].
[On Play] You may return 1 of your Characters to the owner's hand: Play up to 1 Character card with a cost of 5 or less from your hand rested.
Dracule Mihawk

Dracule Mihawk

ST32-003 · Character · Costo 6 · 7000 pow · Muggy Kingdom/The Seven Warlords of the Sea
Dracule Mihawk 6c · "6c Mihawk"
[Your Turn] When this Character becomes rested, draw 1 card and trash 1 card from your hand.
[On Play] If your Leader has the attribute, play up to 1 Character card with a cost of 5 or less that is either [Perona] or has the attribute from your hand.
Perona

Perona

OP14-033 · Character · Costo 5 · 6000 pow · Counter 1000 · Muggy Kingdom/Thriller Bark Pirates
Perona 5c · "Perona" (stun)
[On Play] Up to 2 of your opponent's Characters with a cost of 5 or less cannot be rested until the end of your opponent's next End Phase.
[On K.O.] You may rest 1 of your cards: Play up to 1 green Character card with a cost of 5 or less from your hand.
Jewelry Bonney

Jewelry Bonney

OP07-026 · Character · Costo 5 · 6000 pow · Counter 1000 · Supernovas/Bonney Pirates
Jewelry Bonney · "Stun Bonney"
[On Play] Up to 1 of your opponent's rested Character or DON!! cards will not become active in your opponent's next Refresh Phase.

Bombe da 10 costi

Shanks

Shanks

OP17-022 · Character · Costo 10 · 12000 pow · The Four Emperors/Red-Haired Pirates
Shanks · "10 Shanks"
[Rush] (This card can attack on the turn in which it is played.)
[On Play] Set up to 2 of your DON!! cards as active. Then, rest all of your opponent's Characters.
Law & Bepo

Law & Bepo

ST24-004 · Character · Costo 10 · 11000 pow · Minks/Supernovas/Heart Pirates
Law & Bepo · "Law/Bepo"
[On Play] Rest up to 1 of your opponent's Characters and that Character will not become active in your opponent's next Refresh Phase. Then, if your opponent has 2 or more rested Characters, your Leader gains +2000 power until the end of your opponent's next End Phase.

Eventi

You Can Be My Samurai!!

You Can Be My Samurai!!

OP01-055 · Event · Costo 1 · Land of Wano/Kouzuki Clan
You Can Be My Samurai!! · "Samurai"
[Main] You may rest 2 of your Characters: Draw 2 cards.
The Billion-fold World Trichiliocosm

The Billion-fold World Trichiliocosm

OP06-038 · Event · Costo 1 · Dressrosa/Straw Hat Crew
Billion-fold · "Billions" / "Rad Beam"
[Counter] Up to 1 of your Leader or Character cards gains +2000 power during this battle. Then, if you have 8 or more rested cards, that card gains an additional +2000 power during this battle.
[Trigger] [Trigger] K.O. up to 1 of your opponent's rested Characters with a cost of 3 or less.
Electrical Luna

Electrical Luna

OP08-036 · Event · Costo 3 · Minks
Electrical Luna · "Luna"
[Main] All of your opponent's rested Characters with a cost of 7 or less will not become active in your opponent's next Refresh Phase.
[Trigger] [Trigger] Rest up to 1 of your opponent's Characters.
For Fun

For Fun

OP14-037 · Event · Costo 1 · East Blue/The Seven Warlords of the Sea
For Fun
[Main] You may rest 3 of your cards: K.O. up to 1 of your opponent's rested Characters with 7000 base power or less.
[Counter] Your Leader gains +3000 power during this battle.
I Know You're Strong... So I'll Go All Out from the Very Start!!!

I Know You're Strong... So I'll Go All Out from the Very Start!!!

OP13-040 · Event · Costo 1 · Supernovas/Straw Hat Crew
I Know You're Strong… · "Stronger"
[Main] You may rest 2 of your DON!! cards: Up to 2 of your opponent's rested Characters with a cost of 7 or less will not become active in your opponent's next Refresh Phase.
[Counter] Your Leader gains +3000 power during this battle.
Demon Aura Nine Sword Style Asura Blades Drawn Dead Man's Game

Demon Aura Nine Sword Style Asura Blades Drawn Dead Man's Game

OP12-037 · Event · Costo 1 · Straw Hat Crew
Dead Man's Game · "DMG"
[Main] You may rest 3 of your DON!! cards: Rest up to a total of 2 of your opponent's Characters or DON!! cards.
[Counter] Your Leader gains +3000 power during this battle.

Stage

Coffin Boat

Coffin Boat

OP14-039 · Stage · Costo 1 · East Blue/The Seven Warlords of the Sea
Coffin Boat · "Boat" / "Stage"
[On Play] If your Leader is [Dracule Mihawk], draw 1 card.
[End of Your Turn] If your Leader is [Dracule Mihawk], set up to 1 of your DON!! cards as active.

Tech citate da Impact

Hody Jones

Hody Jones

OP06-035 · Character · Costo 7 · 8000 pow · Fish-Man/New Fish-Man Pirates
Hody Jones · tech
[Rush] (This card can attack on the turn in which it is played.)
[On Play] Rest up to a total of 2 of your opponent's Characters or DON!! cards. Then, add 1 card from the top of your Life cards to your hand.
Smoker

Smoker

OP10-030 · Character · Costo 5 · 7000 pow · Punk Hazard/Navy
Smoker · tech
[Banish] (When this card deals damage, the target card is trashed without activating its Trigger.)
[Activate: Main] Set up to 1 of your DON!! cards as active. Then, you cannot set DON!! cards as active using Character effects during this turn.

Leader e carte chiave degli avversari

Dracule Mihawk
Mirror
OP14-020 · Dracule Mihawk
Sabo
Sabo (Red/Black)
OP13-004 · Sabo
Rocks.D.Xebec
Rocks D. Xebec
OP17-039 · Rocks.D.Xebec
Kaido
Kaido
OP17-058 · Kaido
Charlotte Linlin
Charlotte Linlin (Big Mom gialla)
OP17-099 · Charlotte Linlin
Enel
Enel
OP15-058 · Enel
Portgas.D.Ace
Portgas D. Ace (Ace Luffy)
OP16-001 · Portgas.D.Ace
Loki
Loki
OP17-119 · Loki
Jaguar.D.Saul
Jaguar D. Saul
OP17-089 · Jaguar.D.Saul
Captain John
Captain John
OP17-044 · Captain John
Kyo
Kyo
OP17-045 · Kyo
Shiki
Shiki 7c
OP17-048 · Shiki
Edward.Newgate
Newgate 6c
OP17-040 · Edward.Newgate
Charlotte Linlin
Linlin 5c (blu)
OP17-049 · Charlotte Linlin
Gloriosa
Gloriosa
OP17-046 · Gloriosa
Rocks.D.Xebec
10 Rocks
OP17-118 · Rocks.D.Xebec
And That's When Somebody Makes Fun of Their Friend's Dream!!!!
"Usopp event"
EB02-030 · And That's When Somebody Makes Fun of Their Friend's Dream!!!!
King
King 9c
OP17-064 · King
King
King 6c
EB04-031 · King
Charlotte Linlin
10 Linlin
OP17-112 · Charlotte Linlin
↑ su